The hack that can save pre-release version of Dyson V16

[centralsweeper63]

You incorrectly used a Kirby many times in that link. That is not "scientific evidence".

 

[redtoad1404]

I really couldn't care less if my vacuum is the newest model, or even a nice colour. I just care about reliability, as in that it will turn on and work every day when I need it for 30 or more years. Even if a vacuum only removes a majority of the dirt in the carpet it will eventually, if used every day or two, clean pretty much ALL the dirt from the carpet.

Sounds like a SEBO or Henry would be right up your ally.

 

[centralsweeper63]

I have 2 sebos and a henry. I usually use one of my 13 Electrolux machines, my 8 Kirbys, or my 5 Tellus machines. I like my Electrolux D338 and my Kirby G5 the best though.

 

[herbicide]

I've clarified that post you cited twice was directed at an external source. And RE the first two sentences: no. That was clearly observed and not an insult. That you interpreted a statement of an observation as an insult in fact is highly revealing about the situation. And I agree with you: it doesn't look good when someone mocks and rejects an educational opportunity.

You have failed to provide a single example of a personally directed insult to another member as you claimed. I don't think you understand what an insult is and are showing severe hypersensitivity in lieu of an argument or position, or falling victim to assuming criticism of an idea is the same as criticism of the person who holds the idea. Let me give you some examples of what directed insults of the nature you're struggling to evidence actually look like: 1, 2. I guess you're OK with them, though.

Interesting take, or now are 'you' redefining the word "you?"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/you

Is this enough, or do I need to provide

statistically significant data

to prove the definition of the word 'you?'

Seeing how 'you' are replying to 'me' in the below post, regarding 'me' posting someone else's video, where 'I' use 'their' video to demonstrate the exact issue that "I" experience with a V15 (which "I" have explained to 'you' multiple times).

May I remind 'you' (again...) that 'you' asked 'me' for the specifics in 'your' preceding post, so "I" provided them to 'you.'

OK, too vague to comment so I'll ignore that one.

a) This is a failure of understanding. The user lacks the knowledge and seemingly the intelligence that with strong suction on high resistance carpets, head pressure drops, increasing clamping force. The solution is to directly reduce suction pressure by lowering the motor power, or to allow in bleed relief air (more airflow) via the gates to reduce suction pressure to nearer normal levels. As explained in the lecture, this also doesn't impair cleaning performance. So this was a demonstration of incredible ignorance more than anything.
b) Again, user stupidity. If you're dumb enough to put so much dirt down that it's clearly visible to the naked eye and then briefly go over it once—even lifting it off the floor surreptitiously on the backwards pull in a dodgy manner you'd only expect the most repulsive charlatans to, it's not surprising it left stuff behind. This was a wonderful example of the kind of BS I criticise out there. Poor testing, deeply flawed, unquantified, doesn't capture trends, easy to trick people, unconvincing to the educated and intelligent.

If this is what you're using to justify I'm in the wrong somehow, then that's wonderful for us all to see, since it clearly exonerates me from a false charge. Thanks for the future reference link at least.

 

[centralsweeper63]

Such a funny thread to watch. VacuumFacts, please stop citing yourself as king.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

May I remind 'you' (again...) that 'you' asked 'me' for the specifics in 'your' preceding post, so "I" provided them to 'you.'

Perhaps this clarification will help you understand something many others have likely appreciated by now, if not from the initial comment about an external video posted.
"This is a failure of understanding [by the person in the YT video]. The user [of the machine in the video] lacks the knowledge and seemingly the intelligence..."
If you remain confused at this stage, I'll assume you've no intention of understand, are just troublemaking, and give no further attention.

You incorrectly used a Kirby many times in that link. That is not "scientific evidence".

Pity you didn't evidence how in an objective and convincing manner. Instead, you simply decreed by fiat. This further damages the credibility of future output.

 

[herbicide]

Perhaps this clarification will help you understand something many others have likely appreciated by now, if not from the initial comment about an external video posted.
"This is a failure of understanding [by the person in the YT video]. The user [of the machine in the video] lacks the knowledge and seemingly the intelligence..."
If you remain confused at this stage, I'll assume you've no intention of understand, are just troublemaking, and give no further attention.

Aha, so you misspoke (mistyped) when you used that pesky little word "you're?"

And you wouldn't call someone else demonstrating the same issue (clamping) all those insults? Am I getting this right, oh master?

 

[herbicide]

Pity you didn't evidence how in an objective and convincing manner. Instead, you simply decreed by fiat. This further damages the credibility of future output.

Pity you didn't evidence in an objective and convincing manner how the V15 was being used incorrectly. Instead, you simply insulted and decreed by fiat.