Wanting to Test Vacuums

[herbicide]

I'll leave you to evidence the details and specifics of this convincingly (it never happens with this type of cookie-cutter response). It's too easy to play cosmetic contrarian. I provide evidence, then cite it—because that's why I provided it, then you claim I can't credibly cite my evidence for <no reason stated>. Absurd logic. Then you claim there are inaccurate claims, yet evidence none. If only you had credibility to lose after hollow smear comments like this.

Your responses are the cookie cutter ones. That’s the whole freaking point here.

When you are challenged to provide actual evidence on these matters you simply post circular links back to the same exact materials that are being questioned.

Want evidence? Look at your own posts.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

I mean, that level of hypocritical evasiveness brings this to an end, I guess... >_> Figures.

 

[herbicide]

I mean, that level of hypocritical evasiveness brings this to an end, I guess... >_> Figures.

Exhibit “(I lost count)”

 

[centralsweeper63]

Why does this have to be such a debate. A vacuum needs lots of air moving at a decent speed. You need air moving at a point above the limit of airflow for that orifice size. Pressure then forces the air quicker.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

Why does this have to be such a debate. A vacuum needs lots of air moving at a decent speed. You need air moving at a point above the limit of airflow for that orifice size. Pressure then forces the air quicker.

You're right. It became a debate here when directed attacks via false claims were made that needed defending...and ultimately weren't, naturally. It had already been fully answered here.

 

[herbicide]

You're right. It became a debate here when directed attacks via false claims were made that needed defending...and ultimately weren't, naturally. It had already been fully answered here.

Sounds like maybe someone is in fact motivated by “clicks and profits,”

The worst are motivated by clicks and profit on social media. It doesn't have to be this way.

Explaining it again for you: You continually link your own material to dodge others questions. Often you could easily respond with a sentence or two in good faith versus sending someone down a wild goose chase that frequently doesn’t answer the question anyway.