Tacony Tandem Air Suction Not Too Great

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Stan its a bit rude calling Rob a loser. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

I think the Nilfisk came very close to the Kirby in this test. I'd love to see a Miele C3 or Riccar immaculate or a central vac with the Volt PN and see how well they would do in the test. My guess is VERY WELL! 👍
 
Marcus,


 


So you think it's OK for Rob to get away with all the RUDE comments he made about Bill and I in Reply #68? You must have read Bill's reply to Rob's post. He stated that much of Rob's post didn't make much sense. I would have to agree.


 


 


 
 
I did try my Nilfisk GM80 with the Volt nozzle-WORKS WELL!!!!Since I don't have any new bags for my Nilfisk-threw out the old,smelly paper bag that came with it----and found that a Kirby Filtrte bag fit the bag horn perfectly.Had to fold it to fit.Works really well now and no smell.Rediscovered this machine and like it.Qiet and effective.Will be another one of my favorite cansiters to keep Kirby company.The Volt nozzle sure works better than the air powered nozzle that came with my Nilfisk.Are the new Nilfisk bags made from Filtrete?
 
Well I did the test again, but this time Kirby Gsix vs Lux Royal. Now results are more clear, because of the dirt meter.
Note that Lux pulls 8 from the airflow meter and Nilfisk 9. So not a big difference.
 
Response to Rob

Rob, that statement doesn't make sense as the Tandem air model I have is an expensive premium vacuum. It is made by Tacony. You state higher suction only comes on premium brands then go on to point out Tacony machines.
 
Volt Nozzle for Central Vac

I can see how the battery powered Volt nozzle would be more convenient but why not have a PN that plugs into an outlet? That takes care of the issue with the hose not having electricity. I realize not everyone wants to plug their power nozzle in but I would rather do so than use a battery operated PN. Batteries die fast and don't always provide as much power as a mains powered PN.
 
Getting Along and Forum

As a side note, it would be nice if we could reply directly to someone's post and have it quote the post. It can be difficult to read through the entire thread to figure out what was responded to.

At the end of the day, these are just vacuums. The amount of emotional energy that gets put into these posts can really put one off. There is almost a fear of getting attacked if you say something someone may not agree with. Doesn't seem worth the hassle to argue over any of this.

What I have found is the way to really keep my carpets clean is to vacuum more frequently, vacuum slowly and go over strokes, and vacuum in different directions on certain days. Just by doing this, I am not pulling much out of my carpets anymore. I would use a basic bagless vacuum to see how well my vacuums were performing and was surprised how much came up after I used my Sebo or Kirby. With the Maytag, I vacuum more thoroughly, more often, and much more slowly and there is no longer any fluff/hair that comes out of the carpet. I get a bit of dust which is expected as no vacuum gets it all. Whatever vacuum you use, if you follow my advice, I think your carpets will be pretty clean (with exception to certain vacuums that are very poor). Vacuuming regularly and thoroughly helps keep dirt and dust from becoming embedded in the carpet in the first place.
 
Tacony and Central Vacs

Correct me if I am wrong but, generally speaking, the suction on a central vac tends to be pretty good, so wouldn't a PN with a direct air fan or motor be moot as the higher suction would negate the extra airflow created? Doesn't a vacuum that uses both a direct air motor and bypass motor need to be carefully synced in order to ensure optimal airflow and suction is maintained? Wouldn't simply adding a PN with a direct air motor or fan mess with the balance?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top