Dyson Piston

[Follettolover]

That is the main outrage, ruining a bad brand. But you need a bad product to do that.

I think that more than the product the problem is the target, the brand leveraged on people who have had this product in their homes for a lifetime, non-technological people, people who like to clean the house in their own way, technology is fantastic but it is a completely different world, it's like giving an iPhone to my grandmother, she will never be as happy as with her phone with buttons.
And then there is precisely the question of the idea of the brand that is in people's heads and that then does not reflect that idea

 

[centralsweeper63]

Exactly right!

 

[Follettolover]

I think people loved the product more than its compromises, that is, the cable and the heaviness, in fact now that it is wireless and light people complain because rightly it can't be as powerful as the old ones, also this new cordless by vorwerk still had bags, even little bag then before to keep the dimensions low…suction declines while the bag is halfway full and the bags cost a lot...(but this is a discussion that we have already addressed) for instance the bags are capable of 0,8 l

 

[centralsweeper63]

Suck generosity.

 

[Absolute Rainbow]

In any case, the first Fluffy was a little heavier and thicker than the new one, but it had a rear roller that helped a lot in the backward movement, allowing the dirt not to jump out of the brush while pushing back and all mechanically, a pity that they removed itView attachment 171790

They removed it to make the head slimmer.

 

[Follettolover]

They removed it to make the head slimmer.

yea I know but it was a smart feature and also totally mechanical feature, no motor needed for that back roller