Dyson Piston

[Vacuum Facts]

I assume you had a point but it's just trolling nonsense. There's nothing wrong with my behaviour. You just don't like being at the receiving end of a spade being called a spade. And you're off topic, yet again. If you've nothing to add directly to the original thread topic, please don't comment again.

 

[herbicide]

I assume you had a point but it's just trolling nonsense. There's nothing wrong with my behaviour. You just don't like being at the receiving end of a spade being called a spade. And you're off topic, yet again. If you've nothing to add directly to the original thread topic, please don't comment again.

You just can’t help yourself.

But I’ll make a deal with you. If you show actual receipts for your claims and conclusions, I won’t challenge you to do so.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

You just can’t help yourself.

But I’ll make a deal with you. If you show actual receipts for your claims and conclusions, I won’t challenge you to do so.

I guess I should remember the advice from forums of old: don't feed the troll. Welcome to the ignore list. Population: you.

 

[Absolute Rainbow]

This is a common troll tactic. Say something elsewhere that's antaonistic, logically inconsistent, and ridiculous, wait for a free response that calls a spade a spade, then cherrypick that person pointing this out to misleadingly suggest constitutes 'poor behaviour'. It's crude goading and the best of us are very familiar with it. This is yet more off-topic witch-hunting that has no place here. I appreciate you're stung @herbicide and @Hatsuwr, but if you don't like having your comments responded to openly on my channel, then don't comment there. You've wilfully gone off topic here to attack in a contrived and deceitful way multiple times now without adding any value to the thread topic. Second request to please stay on topic and can the faux witch-hunting.@

The hits keep coming!

Let’s not forget you asked for examples of this behavior. You asked in this very thread.

So, now both asking for evidence on your claims and also directly answering (ahem providing evidence) gets one called a troll amongst many other things.

I assume you had a point but it's just trolling nonsense. There's nothing wrong with my behaviour. You just don't like being at the receiving end of a spade being called a spade. And you're off topic, yet again. If you've nothing to add directly to the original thread topic, please don't comment again.

You just can’t help yourself.

But I’ll make a deal with you. If you show actual receipts for your claims and conclusions, I won’t challenge you to do so.

I guess I should remember the advice from forums of old: don't feed the troll. Welcome to the ignore list. Population: you.

@herbicide now you know what happens when one managed to feed the troll. Your unhelpful take p1553d people like @Vacuum Facts off.

If anyone are still owning a V16 Piston Animal (whether it be normal model or the Submarine one with that rolling mop head), tell me and @Vacuum Facts himself. Also:

 

[Absolute Rainbow]

And for that, @herbicide, you're on my ignore list.

 

[liogu]

The irony is that this review didn't recognise the real problems with this machine or understand exactly why the V16 performs worse than its predecessor out of the box (or how to fix).

Why is anybody supposed to guess why a new product performs worse and why would they try to fix it? That sounds like something a QA team could investigate.

The V16 is great if you fix the actual issue with it.

So are many products that release with critical issues lol

 

[Vacuum Facts]

Why is anybody supposed to guess why a new product performs worse and why would they try to fix it? That sounds like something a QA team could investigate.

The reviewers should have smartly figured it all out, but none have, which to me shows they don't really know what they're talking about, they don't understand things, and can only give a cosmetic review at best, which isn't really valuable. The V16, the new technologies within it, and its cock-ups, are a rare opportunity to quantify the value of the reviews out there.

 

[liogu]

The reviewers should have smartly figured it all out, but none have, which to me shows they don't really know what they're talking about, they don't understand things, and can only give a cosmetic review at best, which isn't really valuable. The V16, the new technologies within it, and its cock-ups, are a rare opportunity to quantify the value of the reviews out there.

But I don't really care about why it performs worse, I (and most people) only care about its performance out of the box.

Knowing why that happens can be a nice addon but, ultimately, Dyson should have fixed whatever the issue is, the conclusion most of these reviews have remains correct, the v16 performs worse out of the box.

I personally don't think reviewers need to explain why the performance is worse, they review the product as it is and expose the results they get. I follow some tech channels that try to go into further level of detail with GPUs, CPUs or cases, however, that is not the standard and those videos are just a 'nerd' show, most people don't care about the details.

 

[Vacuum Facts]

But I don't really care about why it performs worse, I (and most people) only care about its performance out of the box.

I suspect you're right. In which case, as shown early on in this thread a few weeks ago, know the V16 is much poorer out of the box for avoidable reasons that ruin all the advancements otherwise made.

the conclusion most of these reviews have remains correct, the v16 performs worse out of the box.... I personally don't think reviewers need to explain why the performance is worse,

Yes, but it's a trivial one any reviewer can conclude. The problem is, they DO attempt to explain why and get it completely wrong. That's misleading and ends up doing a disservice to viewers. This important point is missed too often. That failure should be called out.