Vacuum Facts
Well-known member
I guess the logic is you effectively empty openly less frequently, so those that lack the basic IQ to empty in 5 seconds without mess on Dyson products have a 'solution', or that like unnecessary gadgets get one. Really, what has happened is that the dupes and clones of Dyson's inventions produced by the competition are so shit that you can't empty without a dust cloud. So, the regressive capitalist in these companies spotted a 'solution' to exploit even more. Why not consume more materials to make a machine to compensate for that pathetic design weakness, which adds to a false economy, and has running costs for more profit, and then make the customer pay even more for that too after tricking them into thinking it's a great idea! Problem is, since all the competition copied that bad solution, Dyson, who lack it because they don't need it, appear to the same lowest common denominator idiot customers as though they now lack an industry wide technology and so aren't as good. It's so ironic, and people are too stupid to even notice, so they get played. Once enough market share is lost from Dyson for them to get scared, they've no choice but to jump on the bandwagon. Instead of doing things right, they now do things that are popular, just to stay afloat. It's a broken system, and the numerically significant lowest common unthinking denominator are responsible for their own diminishment. You can see Dyson doing the same thing with their new wet robot. It has the rotating side brushes. Dyson for years pointed out and evidenced they flick crap everywhere and into the air—the last place you want it, but they've seemingly done as above, jumped on the bandwagon to not lose market share because people wrongly think it's a good thing because all the copycats have it as a means to compensate for a proper solution. Totally regressive.
Last edited:
