Bagged VS Bagless

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

I personally prefer bagged, but what is the point of this thread? it will just go on and on with peoples opinions.


With modern bagged technology, they both do the same thing! one is just messier.
 
Hmm so basically what you're saying is I rim people? If that is what you meant and if you meant that to be an insult,it didn't work.
 
Psml. Obviously someone doesn't know the Radford's very well! Also I know alot,trust me ;)

Ha charming. Well,so now I'm not aloud to even agree with another person? Oh sorry your Highness! 

[this post was last edited: 9/10/2015-18:51]
 
Well seeing how i only have one more chance on here until I'm banned permanently then I have to be. But trust me,I'm not such a goody two shoes in person.

Besides, if I was sparking arguments you and everyone else would soon complain.
 
bagged!

bagged vacuums are easier to empty and the filters tend to stay clean a lot longer. when you empty a bagless machine unhygienic dust fly's everywhere! the filters clog a lot more. on the whole I prefere a bagged machine I have a tiny workshop and when I vacuum that I tend to use a bagless machine because bags in a 8 by 8 summerhouse is just too fidly! overall a bagged machine fits the bill for me. jake
 

Latest posts

Back
Top