Bagged VS Bagless

[vacuumlover]

Psml. Obviously someone doesn't know the Radford's very well! Also I know alot,trust me

Ha charming. Well,so now I'm not aloud to even agree with another person? Oh sorry your Highness! 

[this post was last edited: 9/10/2015-18:51]

 

[alexhoovers94]

of course, but I just think you are very goody two shoes

 

[vacuumlover]

Well seeing how i only have one more chance on here until I'm banned permanently then I have to be. But trust me,I'm not such a goody two shoes in person.

Besides, if I was sparking arguments you and everyone else would soon complain.

 

[sebo_fan]

Oh coming from the one on the site who has continually posted threads about Elites and turbopowers, Do give it a rest Alex. Rather than insulting other members on here, keep your not so subtle thoughts to yourself.

 

[jake1234]

bagged!

bagged vacuums are easier to empty and the filters tend to stay clean a lot longer. when you empty a bagless machine unhygienic dust fly's everywhere! the filters clog a lot more. on the whole I prefere a bagged machine I have a tiny workshop and when I vacuum that I tend to use a bagless machine because bags in a 8 by 8 summerhouse is just too fidly! overall a bagged machine fits the bill for me. jake

 

[citroenbx]

bagged for really dusty jobs

bagless for everyday use