Why Dyson is the best vacuum in the planet.
- Thread starter mike811
- Start date
Help Support VacuumLand:
These "videos" are CRAP no matter how you look at it!!!!We see NO vacuums being used or dust being picked up!!DON'T go by this!!!!YOU need to see and use the vacuum cleaner in question and judge for yourself!!!How come is it most METAL vacuum can be decades old and still WORK-where most plastic bagless machines get buried in the landfills-the MIXED plastics in most of these is NOT recyclable!!When the metal vacuum or other item finally reaches EOL the metal is more easily recycled-and--Plastics require OIL to make!!
Here is what I asked from him:
"Why sand on/under carpet tests are misleading" Because Dyson with its low performance don´t do well on those tests.
Answer:
The first link in the description provides this explanation and the second link is relevant to a full understanding of associated physical process of vacuuming. The test being misleading is not related to the 'performance' of any brand of vacuum for such a 'test'. Such a test is misleading and unrepresentative of real world use or vacuum design.
He is clearly trying to push the Dyson brand.
Real evidence is totally missing.
"Why sand on/under carpet tests are misleading" Because Dyson with its low performance don´t do well on those tests.
Answer:
The first link in the description provides this explanation and the second link is relevant to a full understanding of associated physical process of vacuuming. The test being misleading is not related to the 'performance' of any brand of vacuum for such a 'test'. Such a test is misleading and unrepresentative of real world use or vacuum design.
He is clearly trying to push the Dyson brand.
Real evidence is totally missing.
Another ridiculous answer:
My question:
Flour under the carpet test is very simple test of the deep cleaning performances. Dyson vacuums has a poor airflow so they can't deepclean. Simple physics.
His answer:
Unfortunately, this doesn't address any of the issues raised in the videos linked in the description. It's for that reason why it's a fallacious test and doesn't really demonstrate deep cleaning, as convincing as it may look, cosmetically. As stated in this video, only industry standard testing is meaningful for the three reasons discussed. YouTube bedroom demos and 'tests' have value as visual entertainment only and cannot be used to conclude anything about real-world performance of any vacuum.
Hi has probably never used a real vacuum
My question:
Flour under the carpet test is very simple test of the deep cleaning performances. Dyson vacuums has a poor airflow so they can't deepclean. Simple physics.
His answer:
Unfortunately, this doesn't address any of the issues raised in the videos linked in the description. It's for that reason why it's a fallacious test and doesn't really demonstrate deep cleaning, as convincing as it may look, cosmetically. As stated in this video, only industry standard testing is meaningful for the three reasons discussed. YouTube bedroom demos and 'tests' have value as visual entertainment only and cannot be used to conclude anything about real-world performance of any vacuum.
Hi has probably never used a real vacuum
vacfan1982
Well-known member
The second video I agree with. You can take agitation too far. But clearly Dysons are not the best vacuums. The latest Dysons do a decent job but the use of multi cyclones will always restrict airflow.
Carpet shedding agitation isn't needed, but you still need certain amount of agitation (with the airflow + suction) te pick up deepdown grit.
So I agree with you on that.
Someone used photos of his videos and he got very angry, but at the same time he uses other youtubers video screenshots in his videos including mine
According to him you can clean carpets with minimal agitation, airflow and suction if the cleaning head has right design. Oh well let him think so.
I asked documents for his claims and so far he hasn't gave any.
Big note that I this is nothing personal against him. I just think, that his claims are so far off from the truth that I had to discuss about this subject.
So I agree with you on that.
Someone used photos of his videos and he got very angry, but at the same time he uses other youtubers video screenshots in his videos including mine
According to him you can clean carpets with minimal agitation, airflow and suction if the cleaning head has right design. Oh well let him think so.
I asked documents for his claims and so far he hasn't gave any.
Big note that I this is nothing personal against him. I just think, that his claims are so far off from the truth that I had to discuss about this subject.
vacfan1982
Well-known member
I just had a look at some of his videos. Is he being paid by Dyson?
huskyvacs
Well-known member
It's all just clickbait, friends. People shovel these videos out to get their YouTube Partner money and dupe people into watching them. Don't take them so seriously, it's just more of the same trash that litters YouTube these days sadly.
Dyson claims
I don't take these seriously. Turns out that the claims "best cleaning performance across all floor types" comes from the Dyson.
He just admitted it in his latest comment.
So he obviously work for the Dyson.
Comment can be seen in the link where I asked who makes these tests.
So this turns out to be just a Dyson hype.
http://https//youtu.be/z8KEzjabtRo
I don't take these seriously. Turns out that the claims "best cleaning performance across all floor types" comes from the Dyson.
He just admitted it in his latest comment.
So he obviously work for the Dyson.
Comment can be seen in the link where I asked who makes these tests.
So this turns out to be just a Dyson hype.
http://https//youtu.be/z8KEzjabtRo
luxkid1980
Well-known member
I didn't even have to watch the video to know that Dyson's are mostly hype. haha.
vacfan1982
Well-known member
A lot of the things he says in his videos are true he sounds like a very knowledgeable guy. He makes some very interesting points. But i lose respect when he claims Dysons are the best cleaning vacs 
I agree with you. Many good points in his videos, but when he said that now the best cleaning vacuum is modern technology bagless vacuum (Dyson). He also said that the bagged vacuum is old technology which clogs up quickly. At that point I lost respect.
He hasn't used modern bagged vacuum because for example Miele C3 has a lot more airflow even with the full bag than the best Dyson available. Miele C3 only lost 11 cfm comparing empty bag to the full bag.
I will ignore him now on and use the vacuums what I think clean the best
He hasn't used modern bagged vacuum because for example Miele C3 has a lot more airflow even with the full bag than the best Dyson available. Miele C3 only lost 11 cfm comparing empty bag to the full bag.
I will ignore him now on and use the vacuums what I think clean the best
vacfan1982
Well-known member
Yes me too Mr Snickers I asked him to come on here for a debate but I don't think he will. He will get ripped to shreads on here haha. Btw it feels like Finland in Wales today, it's bloody freezing! Brrrrrrrrr
I asked him to come on here for a debate but I don't think he will. He will get ripped to shreads on here haha. Btw it feels like Finland in Wales today, it's bloody freezing! Brrrrrrrrr
huskyvacs
Well-known member
This makes me wonder if Dyson has "hitmen" that will eliminate you if you say bad words about them like Tacony has been doing to one of the members here.
What a joke...
Years ago, my wife and I bought in to the Dyson hype, and bought one for $400 that lasted about 6 months. I can say with some certainty that they don't hold up to daily usage, at least around our house. Wish I would have spent the money on a used Kirby back then, we'd still be using it today.
Years ago, my wife and I bought in to the Dyson hype, and bought one for $400 that lasted about 6 months. I can say with some certainty that they don't hold up to daily usage, at least around our house. Wish I would have spent the money on a used Kirby back then, we'd still be using it today.
bryan1980
I have the Dyson DC40 just for the collection and demonstration purposes. It looks nice, but I wouldn't use it for daily use. Bad performance on my high pile rugs and very flexible spine/handle will keep it in the closet.
I have the Dyson DC40 just for the collection and demonstration purposes. It looks nice, but I wouldn't use it for daily use. Bad performance on my high pile rugs and very flexible spine/handle will keep it in the closet.
