The WORST vacuum cleaners, Ever made. In History.

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Well I have researched into vacuum cleaners and it appears the Hoover One which I recalled was given a bar review by the British Consumer magazine "Which". I did look at the machine out of interest and they wanted as much as a Dyson. A Very Ugly looking thing I thought. I am not certain what year it was launched and when it ended. But it has suddenly dropped. Trouble is they are all made at a price and to not last too long.
 
Hoover "The One"

I agree with Keith, the original The One is probably the worst machine I've ever used. It was pretty much a complete disaster. It was a LONG time in development and had a lot of manufacturers worried that Hoover were working on a completely radical, new vacuum that would take over the market.

When it finally arrived, it was a complete joke. The cyclone was the most stupid design I think I've ever seen and clogged up almost instantly. The brushroll was sparse and the bristles were like baby hair they were so soft. The All Floor cleaning system didn't switch the brushroll off - it just released a set of brushes like on a Numatic floortool, with the brushroll still spinning, so it scattered dirt across floors rather than picking it up. The build quality was also pretty shocking.

A friend of mine who was working in Currys at the time told me that every single machine they sold was returned.

Hoover pretty quickly redesigned a lot of the machine. The later models weren't as bad and came down quite dramatically in price, but by then the damage had been done.
 
Eureka Power Plus bagless

We had those in the UK as the Electrolux Vitesse Pet Lover. It upsets me greatly that the word "Electrolux" was on such a horrific machine. Absolutely awful vacuum.

US guys, wouldn't the Hoover Z be considered quite a flop?
 
Most over rated

Has to be any Dyson, cheap plastic dustblower, when they were first getting established in the States, Jimmy martin brought one to my house, I had my little dog then, and had not vacuumed in a week, so we thought it would really pich up some dirt and hair, we vacuumed a good sized area and got almost no dog hair and very little dust, I had a Rainbow E, I went over the same area once and the water was full of dog hair and sand...as far as I was concerned , case closed, because I dont consider a Rainbow very good!
 
connies

One of my favorites is the connies from the early 60's. They are very simple and powerful. A lot of the early brands like Eureka,Lewyt were very good machines but now they are crap. I was never a Lux fan. Every old lux I came across needed a new hose because they used the old woven type hose.
 
The Regina Housekeeper was very crappy, certainly one of the most poorly built and shortest lasting machines I've known to exist, but for being in the vacuum business they are really before my time, in fact I've only ever worked on two of them myself since working in the business since 2004, which says that despite the many thousand sold very few actually lived while I see many Hoovers Eurekas and most other machines from that time. However the Hoover Windtunnel V2 s very much in my time and very much a horrible piece of crap! The big issue that was never resolved was the fact that the brushrolls would strip out where the drive shafts went, originally they had the solid molded brush roll with the round hole with a flat spot on both sides for the drive shaft to go, the plastic would strip right out as soon as too much resistance was applied. They tried to fix this by using a metal insert in the end of the brushroll for the shaft to go in, thinking that would solve it, but all that would happen is the insert would strip inside the brush, yes this took longer, but it still happened. the bearings on the other end would always fill with hair and melt up, and the hair would collect against the gearbox and the bruhroll and melt that up, and the gears had a nasty habit of stripping out as well, and they weren't too fun or easy to change either. They had a lovely habit of the brushes stripping the first time you ran it. Thankfully I only worked on one or two myself, and never did any serious in-depth repairs, but I watched others do it many times, and I heard all the horror stories. I don't think there is a single worst vacuum ever, but there are definitely many tied for that place. too many good and unique ideas gone terribly wrong...
 
The worst uprights I've ever tried are the Dirt Devil (UK company based) bagged uprights based on the old Electrolux Contour uprights. A chore to push, awful plastics and even if later models were fitted with HEPA cartridges, these heaps were too noisy as well.

Also sold under Swan and JMB catalogue versions.

sebo_fan++2-3-2014-13-22-9.jpg
 
I have a HOOVER "Z"

Big surprise, right? They DO clean well, but they were considered HOOVER'S "Edsol". THey were designed for a "MAN" to like/use. A "butch" vacuum....... I like it's performance, but could NEVER use it daily. Too many bells and whistles. a LOT to break. I've opened up mine once at a mini meet. If you collect HOOVER, ( and shouldn't everyone?) you MUST have at least one Z.
 
And by "Edsol" you mean,

"Edsel", Chevrolet's car of yesteryear. Of course, I collect Hoovers, Don't you do, too, John? 
smiley-laughing.gif
 
A responce to Super Sweeper's comment to me

Yea thanks i don't allow any one in my family to even say Dyson, not even my parent's lol. :)
 
Worst of the worst

Has to be the already mentioned original Regina Housekeeper 1000 in all it's pink glory. The plastic they used must have been the cheapest most brittle known to man kind. Sadly that very same garbage plastic made it's way into the Electrikbrooms starting in 1984 on the motor housings which see 90% of them cracked where the dirt path screws into the upper bag retainer portion. By late 1989 that same cheap plastic was used on the upper handle too on the Cosmo style brooms and they are often found cracked.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top