kirby or dyson

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

hi happy new year! Recently we bought a dyson and was happy with it until i vacuumed with a kirby 519. To my amazment i empted it after using the dyson to vacuum up bird seed and some regular dirt and found the bag filled. It seemed that the dyson went over all the dirt but never sucked it up. My mom said my bag was filled at the start. In ure oppinion what does clean better a kirby or dyson.
 
KIRBY THUMBS UP! (and hands down!)

Well, the Kirby will always clean better. They are so much better designed. But I think the Air-Way with a power nozzle is the best. A Kirby is great. USE IT!

~~K~~

P.S. James! HIGH-FIVE! I figure you will be posting very shortly...
 
From what I have tried-KIRBY!!!I have two Dysons-one of them came from a Kirby dealer-was a trade in to a Kirby.I feel Kirby's greater airflow and more powerful roller brush are the clinchers here.
 
Kirby or Dyson

The people on this forum never cease to amaze me. The debate over which cleans better are nothings but opinions, and opinions are like rear ends.. everyone has them and they all STINK. It's really immaterial which one cleans better, because so much of that question depends on who is using the machine. I mean we are talking about a 1959 Kirby vacuum with a 4 amp motor and a cloth bag thats belching dust---compared to a modern vacuum designed for modern homes witha HEPA filter and uncloggable filtration system. I think it's awful immature to start a thread like this, when we have seen in the past that it starts a impassioned debate. It really solves nothing and can spiral out of control easily. You should use whatever vacuum you feel comfortable with.. I myself choose a vacuum that won't blow dust all over my house & cause Glenda the good witch of the north to say "ooh.. what a smell of sulfur."

Derreck
 
We choose whether or not to let it out of our control. Most mature people would simply think of these as opinions; not trying to tell people that they are smarter and know more because the vacuum they support is better. We have seen these threads get out of hand, but we choose to let this happen.

I like to think that an older vacuum with more experience actually cleans better. They sure last longer! And Derreck: you can update the Kirby (as shown on another thread) to take paper bags. They aren't that much of a dirt leaker after that.

WE choose to make this discussion a heated argument. Let's be mature and not let it get that way! ;-)
 
Notice how this thread becomes more heated because of the posts that say it shouldn't become heated ;)

Ian
 
My 2 cents

I love vintage Kirbys as they are beautiful machines, however, in terms of overall efficiency, the Dyson would be the clear winner. Now with a more modern Kirby G-series or Sentria, the outcome would probably be different; I can see a potential advantage there; in fact, I'd probably bet the Kirby this time. Although until I can actually get up front with the machines next year and experience it firsthand, I won't know for sure. Not a 40+ year old vintage one, though.

Following up on what Derreck said, posts like this one are a perfect example of children not knowing how a particular machine works. If they did, they would not be posting anything like this in the first place. I fully understand and agree completely with what Tom G has said (both to me personally and in previous posts on here) about children posting on the forum (and another poster with the mentality of a 12-year-old...) and to find that it is for the most part TRUE. The irony lies in the fact that children are causing most of these arguments due to the fact that they are posting their opinions as FACTS. When everyone else was simply guessing, whether or not they knew it, Derreck set the record straight with a truly FACTUAL post. I also know by experience...I had to wait a few years until I was 18 to join the VCCC proper, but then (due to reading up on machines AND buying them) I came on with a better understanding of the vacuum cleaner than I would have had a forum like this existed when I was 10 and I posted nonsense there. With age comes knowledge as well as experience.

Closing the forums off to dues-paying members would definitely keep the children who have no intention of joining as guests off and prevent this bantering (and also allow for some tongue-in-cheek or slightly off-color humor from time to time without getting chided for it), which is one of the many reasons I wholeheartedly support a private forum, or at the very least a members-only section with its own forum in addition to this one. I hope to voice my opinion on this at the meeting next year.

I find all of this interesting because when I was 10-12 years old, I was happily enjoying activities that someone of that age would enjoy (and getting helpful exercise in the process) instead of sitting in front of the computer posting on a message board. Hell, I thought a message board was something mounted to the wall that you tacked notes to (and I had experience with computers), but to quote Bob Dylan, I guess "the times they are a-changin'".

At any rate, kids should be kids while they still can...

--Austin
 

Latest posts

Back
Top