wyaple
Well-known member
The first measurement was easy to get, the last one (CFM at the nozzle) required me to build an airflow box. I think this pic should easily illustrate where and by how much CFM is lost in this machine. I think this is excellent performance from a 29 year old cleaner, admittedly with a new fan installed.
From the base of the machine to the nozzle, there is a loss of 161-121 = 40 CFM. This represents about a 25% loss from the direct air motor. Of course as the bag fills, the airflow will drop as well.
Last note: the rug plate opening is largest I've measured (a little over 36 square inches) and the CFM density is well above average, about 3.3 CFM/Sq. In. If you ever wondered if this old beast was still capable of deep cleaning, it certainly is.
This is the exact machine that started my vac collection and interest in measuring all aspects of these "labor savers".
Bill

From the base of the machine to the nozzle, there is a loss of 161-121 = 40 CFM. This represents about a 25% loss from the direct air motor. Of course as the bag fills, the airflow will drop as well.
Last note: the rug plate opening is largest I've measured (a little over 36 square inches) and the CFM density is well above average, about 3.3 CFM/Sq. In. If you ever wondered if this old beast was still capable of deep cleaning, it certainly is.
This is the exact machine that started my vac collection and interest in measuring all aspects of these "labor savers".
Bill
