Brett has a point
Recall that in the very first post, Kyle claimed that he had EVERYTHING. We can presume that he told Reggie that. Recall further that my format for valuation responses includes the words "based on his description":
"I _____________ think the fair market value of Kyle's Compact, based on his description and the pic, is worth between __________ and _____________. Disclaimer: This "educated guess" is based on my limited experience with a very small and specialized market and should be used for discussion purposes only. You are cautioned that prices may vary incredibly."
That qualification to the estimate form is necessary because Kyle has promised, but Kyle has not delivered vis-a-vis pics and inventory. So, we work around it for this valuation exercise.
Also, (and this is more the Aunt Tillie approach) if there were a buyer who had some correct vintage tools and Kyle's package filled it in, value may be higher for that person. But, we are probably not talking about fair market value in that case, we are talking about someone who can justify paying more than market value because of the result at the other end.
I once sold a train made from a Lux XXX and three toasters for $750 (but that was in 1990 and my exposure was to a very small market). The value of a unit to me has nothing to do with its fair market value.