Dyson Radial Root Cyclone Doesn't Work Very Well!

[dys0nb0y]

Looks like they fix the problem on the new big ball as I think the problems was the dirt from the from seal getting into the filter chamber as they were quite close.

 

[dys0nb0y]

As you can see the seals I'm not in contact with the ducting weather filter used to be.

 

[marcusprit]

It looks like Cinetic has taken cyclones to their maximum performance. I wonder if they can take them any further?

 

[marcusprit]

Oh yeah it's a different set up. You got your Cinetic then Josh. How is it?

 

[marcusprit]

Can I see the bottom of the cyclone in bin?

 

[dys0nb0y]

i haven't ordered it yet but i definitely will do it tonight.

 

[alexhoovers94]

looking back at older Dyson's, the efficiency has improved but they will never be perfect, I am convinced that bags trap more dust before the motor though, newer synthetic bags that is.
Although, without Dyson, bagged technology probably may not of moved forward as well as it has.

 

[marcusprit]

Well I hope bags don't collect more dust than the Cinetic cause there's no pre motor filter!

 

[alexhoovers94]

Mr Dyson is really pushing his luck isn't he?

 

[dys0nb0y]

The cyclones have just been made perfect with the New kinetic the filtration must be amazing as I haven't got A pre-motor filter The cyclones must be efficient to not need that.

 

[dys0nb0y]

And how is Mr Dyson pushing his luck.

 

[marcusprit]

Haha I'm sure they wouldn't release Cinetic without thoroughly testing and perfecting over a very long period of time.
I'm sure it will work fine but only time will tell.

 

[alexhoovers94]

Taking away the pre filter, I don't care how efficient it is, it still needs the extra motor protection, for anything that may find its way through.

James Dyson constantly trys to fix things that are not broken.

 

[dys0nb0y]

they might not being broken by definitely improved.

 

[marcusprit]

Personally I don't have a problem washing the filter every 3 to 6 months but some people either forget or can't be bothered so it's a good thing for them providing it works well of course.

 

[dys0nb0y]

the dyson kinetic cylinder has been doing well.

 

[parwaz786]

I assume you will be keeping the Dyson, Alex

 

[dys0nb0y]

Doesn't look like I'll be getting the kinetic where I was getting it from the deal wasn't working. Also I do really like the 41 MKII lunch and I'm not sure which one to get

 

[dysonman1]

Did anyone notice on the YouTube engineering demonstration of Cinetic 'science' - when they were demonstrating "ten years worth of dust" (they used a white powder), the opening of the hose is unobstructed? Having no attachment (like a crevice tool) on the end of the hose, allows maximum airflow (and maximum separation). But in regular, normal use, the amount of air into the machine is constantly changing, as the tools are used. As the machine goes from carpet (sealing to the soleplate) to floors (no seal), the amount of airflow into the cyclones changes. This change effects how efficiently the cyclones can separate (and in the case of the red tips on the cinetic models - how fast they oscillate). I would have liked to see the engineering department test for 'ten years' worth of dust using attachments, restricting maximum air movement. As it would have to cope with dust in normal home use.

 

[jmurray01]

This thread worked better than any anti-depressant for me tonight!!  What a laugh.


 


The bottom line is though, as I knew, Dyson will never manufacture a vacuum cleaner which meets 100% of its marketing promises.


 


On that note, I think I'll vacuum the living room with the 2011 Numatic Henry.  At least that keeps the dust where it belongs...  IN THE BAG!