Dyson Piston

[herbicide]

This is inaccurate again. Like a common AI, your output is fraught with mistakes. My testing is not laboratory grade whatsoever and I've been very clear about this from the start. What it is, though, is free of the more ridiculous flaws seen in amateur testing polluting the internet.

Well this is refreshing, the first part anyway.

Yet we are supposed to ignore others 'amatuer testing' but put full faith in your 'amatuer testing.'

 

[Absolute Rainbow]

This is inaccurate again. Like a common AI, your output is fraught with mistakes. My testing is not laboratory grade whatsoever and I've been very clear about this from the start. What it is, though, is free of the more ridiculous flaws seen in amateur testing polluting the internet.

@Vacuum Facts more misunderstanding again, sorry. This is not like AI, is not really fraught with mistakes. You took my words out of context - fitting for an arrogant guy with all the knowledge but little understanding (no offense though). Lab-like and laboratory-grade are not the same.

I can still agree that your testing procedure is free of the worst flaws of the kind YOU think I champions, when I have watched your videos. Surely, you're thinking that I never watched your videos. I am not an AI and my answers are far better than those generative AI. @Vacuum Facts, you just misunderstood me again, just as you thought I did you.

 

[centralsweeper63]

Vacuumfacts, how is absolute rainbow an AI. I just don't understand.

 

[centralsweeper63]

I am trying to find the thread that vacuumfacts says that all his reviews have the testing procedures. I tried to find what post it was on. Then I looked on vacuum facts account for what post it was on. Then I found out that I am unable to view his account because he restricted my access to it. Anyway, I want to appologise if this is on the wrong thread, there is so many Dyson based threads and I can never remember what one I need to post on. I will watch all your reviews vacuumfacts and tell you all the errors I see in your testing. Evenly spread, how is that specific enough. Brush over twice, what brush and how stiff is it, how hard are you pressing down on it, is the back and forth motion consistent. 0.5 meters per second, how do you measure that. How is Dyson zorb exactly a replacement to real dirt. Dyson zorb has to be slightly damp meaning it is not going to work properly. I notice the nozzle is not being guided perfectly straight, how does this effect results. I could go on and on, however I know that it is not worth it.

 

[centralsweeper63]

Also, I have never, ever seen someone vacuum the same spot 10 times. That is not realistic. Most people don't even vacuum in lines.