I enjoy Dyson stick vacuums and have used their products in general. But I'm not gonna blindly defend them either.
It's not quite that. There are good technical explanations for the things people have seen cosmetically that make the V16 weak as a product but no one seems to have figured out why. There are dozens of reviews now. Dozens. And not a single one has connected the dots and shown why various things are happening with that product. That to me is far worse than any failures that Dyson are guilty of. It illustrates the serious failure of the internet and social media and those contributing to it. The sheer scale of that failure—which is the worst thing of all and deserves more criticism that anything by far—is getting a free pass. The V16 has been a rare opportunity to expose this deficiency and it too will be hammered in my review, along with Dyson.
And I'm helping you out by calling said reviewers out.
It's not helpful. At all. Speaking in my name in the way you are just sullies it, especially when you are getting things completely wrong. You don't understand enough to speak in my name. Kindly stop.
It is a cliffhanger that goes in circles
Is it because I unintentionally and always misunderstanding you, @Vacuum Facts? Are you sure I'm useless? You have helped me so I help you back, even if you're not grateful and accusing me of everything. "You're getting things completely wrong", even the basics I could and can only get wrong? This is not the case, @Vacuum Facts. I read your lecture, I watched your videos, and you shouldn't be shoulder-ing your burden alone. Best of lucks, just make sure you're not burnt out.
True! Could've been avoided if Vacuum Facts or a trustworthy reviewers cut the metaphorical knot and just, y'know, do the job for everyone!It is a cliffhanger that goes in circles
This is what @Vacuum Facts himself ultimately falls short. He is very objective and very knowledgeable, but sadly he is very obtuse and apparently secretly flips out the moment there's any hint of misinformation within any of us - I'm a clear example, @centralsweeper63, for he told me that I got things completely wrong, as if I've never watched his lecture or any of his reviews ever. Is it any wonder why people struggled to understand him? I outright called TechRadar out directly for the V16 floorhead is not a big issue, and yet Vacuum Facts outright dismissed my "stunt", claiming that I am not helpful and calling me completely wrong! That response above is a main thing he got wrong - a sad flaw to his otherwise extremely objective takes and informative explanations. I like him and tend to agree with him, by myself and not merely out of my obligation (I could've subscribed to him but I didn't).
I think I missed where I said to "trust me". I don't expect people to believe anything without evidence.
I'm not sure what you're referring to.
I don't believe that is its price.
It's in the review videos. Fine dust is dry microsponge dust previously extracted from cleaning with wide range of particle sizes. Mass increase of machine is measured. Then the analyses are produced as shown and interpreted.
That video explains everything about how vacuum cleaners work and the parameters often used to measure various aspects of them. If you found it pointless, well, not much I can offer to help further.
Thanks.
Yet when you’re asked for evidence you respond to vailed name calling and insults.
Again, I'm not sure what topic or question specifically you're talking about and this just reads as smear. I also have a sneaking suspicion we'll never find out, either...
Oh well... At least all of us have good points.
Take your pick, the vast majority of your responses here or on YouTube. You don’t have to search long nor hard.
You'll have to be far more specific and detailed than that. If it's as easy as you say, you should have had no trouble in providing something tangible for a discussion... This is what smear looks like: vague mud slinging.
And here we have “Exhibit C.”
The hits keep coming!
