Dyson customer service

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

bendy plastic

It is not, in my opinion, the same thing to compare the plastic of modern Dyson cleaners against that of older Dyson cleaners as if it were some kind of barometer of the quality that one can expect from a cleaner.

If I mention the Hoover Turbopower 2 cleaners, that's what most manufacturers were setting the standard against at one time. Compare that to a modern Dyson.
 
I agree with Marcus. I will post a pic of me bending my DC14 wand handle, I can actually NOT break it, it's impossible unless I get sharp pliers to cut the plastic. I can get a hammer and bash it into a Dyson clear bin, it will bounce off. that is the flexible plastic.

If it is solid, like the dual cyclone Dyson's and early DC07's, they will break. It is like glass. Glass is solid and hard, but try bending it slightly, it will break.

I used to hate the DC41 after trying it for a week in my home, but it is actually well made.

Guess what? Drop a vacuum that has a foot pedal from approx. 5 ft from the ground. the foot pedal will most likely break, because the user must push the pedal for the machine to recline. the pressure of the drop caused the pedal to break.

Drop the DC41 from the same height, the foot pedal will just push up like it is meant to. The "pull back" of the handle which the user must do is done by the floor (resultant force) acting against the pedal, so the machine reclines.
 
Nobody knows the cost of making a Dyson so no point in speculating. I only mentioned £24 I was not asking for a running commentary on here.

Vintagerepairer,

I'm not sure what your point is. Of course it costs Dyson money to run the business, it costs EVERY single business money to run operations! I was pointing out that Dyson provide excellent customer service, nothing more, nothing less.
 
As I promised, here are some pics of how durable the dysons have been. DC14+ unless your DC07 is a later Malaysian one, those are solid.

parwaz786-2014112111284205948_1.jpg

parwaz786-2014112111284205948_2.jpg

parwaz786-2014112111284205948_3.jpg

parwaz786-2014112111284205948_4.jpg
 
Very good service then :) I had an experience though when fax were a little bit rude on the phone, like with their tone, felt like doing it back but didn't
 
I never doubted the quality of the plastics in this thread, I only said it doesn't feel like quality! It just seems wrong, would you like your car to bend as you drive it down the road? 
smiley-surprised.gif
 
hi-loswitch,

Yes Vax customer care is excellent too. A guy at work advised me his aunty had an issue with their machine and they called through and Vax dispatched a new machine to them. They gave him their old one. He tried to fix it and sell on Ebay. With myself I was fortunate to get a free cordless DC35 from Dyson when my DC24 duct housing cracked and became unusable under warranty. I did pay quite a bit of the DC24.

Super Sweeper,

I understand totally what you mean and where you are coming from. For me, the bendy plastics don't feel nice and sturdy but I guess Dyson discovered that Polypropylene which is softer and allows for more 'play' might be a better choice for their machines. I purchased a DC04 in 2002 with an ABS handle, the 'cap' broke off the handle within a week of use so Dyson sent a new one and it was a different Polypropylene one. I took off the cap and put it on and that never broke. Eventually the 'handgrip' snapped after 4 years and I complete new polypropylene handle was supplied that's still intact even if the rest of the machine doesn't work now. The SEBO that my friend has uses ABS construction but it seems to be moulded thicker and never encountered any plastic part breaking on it in its 7 years use.
 
Blakaeg, they're Air3 comes apart, so when my floorhead cracked Vax sent me a new one complete with the bolt to screw it on to the bottom with.
 
Sebo_Fan,

Where did I blame Dyson for the plastic revolution? Even the mighty HOOVER had warping plastic hoods in 1957! Sears-Kenmore made GREAT use of plastics in the 1970s and 1980s. Really, Hoover was the one who lead the plastic revolution during the late 1980s, when they launched the Elite. the Elite was entirely plastic, in fact it wasn't even HOOVER quality plastics. I've seen many examples with broken fan chambers, but worse of all was those screw tabs on the fan case! those became so brittle over time, they just snapped off! It was there that two kinds of plastics would be known to the vacuum world, the quality drop-it-off-a-roof plastics, like those seen in Sears-Kenmore canisters and Hoover Concepts, Fantoms, and then the look-at-it-wrong-and-it'll-snap-into-a-gazillion-pieces plastics, like those seen in older Dysons, and even some Elites! 
smiley-wink.gif
 
To Blakaeg

"Vintagerepairer,

I'm not sure what your point is. Of course it costs Dyson money to run the business, it costs EVERY single business money to run operations! I was pointing out that Dyson provide excellent customer service, nothing more, nothing less"

My point was -speaking only in the business sense and in terms also of profit measured in pounds, shillings, and pence- was that one sees on the internet all the time examples of where figures for all sorts of things are quoted but which do not take into account all factor of which the debate or discussion in question relates to.

Your mentioning of £24 said that you'd "heard" this to be the cost, and indeed it was also a figure which I'd read on here before, but as I said that time also, it may be correct that this is the cost to build the machine (I don't know if it is or isn't, as you said later on here, we don't know at all really but certainly it sounds feasable given the low labour costs where the cleaners are made) yet I doubt it takes account of the overheads.

Now, I agree that as far as customer service goes, Dyson are generally rated very highly, and in this day and age people seem to expect only the very best from a big company. I get this. But what many people don't seem to understand is the need for great customer service when the business is actually providing a service -such as your telephone or electricity provider- is pretty much essential, whereas once a product has been purchased, the money has been taken for it upfront at point of sale. As such, to offer poor service would not make any difference to the quantifiable income to that company in the same way it would if I changed my electricity account from one to the other.

What it might do of course is to deter the purchaser from buying that brand again next time, but there is never ever any guarentee that the same brand would have been purchased anyway, had good aftercare and customer service been in place. Added to which, with every day that passes we all become a day older, thus newer purchasers are coming into the market place all the time, and their purchsases of brands which the likes of you and I would never touch will compensate for the differences in sales.

So, my point here is, yes Dyson does offer great customer service, but as an avenue for making money, it is not the most important aspect of their business by a long stretch. I am sure you know Dyson recently scaled back their hours of business considerably when it came to customer service, making me wonder if they've realised what I've thought for many years - that if your cleaner breaks at 10pm on a Saturday night, it really could wait till Monday morning. Likewise taking into account also the cost of administering the cost of spares under warrenty, in many other businesses the cost of doing this would have to be carefully checked against making a more durable part to begin with.
 
customer service can be VERY important to a business, think of it like this: Billy-Joe calls up Dyson because his DC903 snapped in half. if Dyson sends him a new DC903, covered by the warranty, and provides him with a friendly and relaxed customer service agent, Billy-Joe will then think highly of Dyson, and go prancing down the street about what a great company they are. Then Billy-Joe's friends will go out and buy Dyson, then they'll recommend them to their friends, and so on.....


 


Now, if Dyson said to Billy-Joe, "You broke that Dyson yourself, LOL we have your money now, thanks!", then Billy-Joe will NOT think highly of Dyson, and NOT recommend them. 


 


But then again, does a business such as Dyson care what their customers think? Do they really need the extra recommendations when they have flooded the market already? 
 
"But then again, does a business such as Dyson care what their customers think? Do they really need the extra recommendations when they have flooded the market already?"

That's exactly what I am saying. No manufacturer of a product can ever truly know why a slump in sales has occured, unless of course there has been some specific isolated bad-press, for instance a whole batch of something or other being faulty and it making it into the media etc. So the prospect of someone not buying another brand X product due to poor aftercare can't really be quantified as there was no proof they'd buy that brand again anyway. This is in contrast to the service industry who supply regular customers on a montly or annual basis; when they lose a customer they CAN actually quantify the potential losess.
 
Dyson DC04 spares obsolete!!!

Last week I got an Email from Dyson, stating that from December 2014, and January 2015, spare parts and booking service call-outs would cease for the DC04 models!

The general statement was that it was to improve the technological development of newer, more efficient models.

I deleted the email, and can't remember which was being stopped first - I think the call-outs, but cannot be sure.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top