Dyson cinetic big ball

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Very interesting concept

I noticed it was on the American site as well, but not available to buy yet. I Wonder if Dyson is going to phase out the number nomenclature, as the new machine has no designation like "DC40" or "DC41." It appears the "Big Ball" only goes by that name. It looks like a great machine.
 
The 2nd and 3rd generation Ball Uprights have exhausted the air from the side of the ball too.

I take it 'big ball' the ball is bigger than the DC41&#92DC65? It does look bigger from the pictures! If it is why go bigger? Better manvouability?
 
It's just the side front of the ball in the dc24 and 25. When vacuuming, the machine is tiled back of course, so the exhaust air blows up too and not on the floor
 
So what are you suppose to use to clean these messes up with......???

Dyson do advise not to pick certain things like carpet fresheners, powder etc... as I've seem posts on there Facebook page advising users of this. I think vacuuming up these things if they find out can void the warranty. Again what are you suppose to use..... a vacuum cleaner so what is a Dyson if it is not a vacuum cleaner!?

I bet parwaz786 this type of dirt will clog the cyclones up!

I noticed the new Cinetic Upright on some promotional pictures has a red line around the bin which I think is to show users where to fill up to before emptying the bin!
 
Lol, but TBH I dont care if I have a Cinetic vacuum or not. I would only want one if I can vacuum up a ton of plaster dust with it without losing suction or any dust going to the motor
 
Well I don't think you'll be vacuuming up a ton of laster dust with one of these new Big Ball Cinetic Uprights as I'm sure the same rules apply to this like the cylinder&#92canister one has.
 
they suggest not to but you can use with plaster. As i have the dc54 as i had it for a while but i found it tricky to empty so i got rid of it but i also had a dc39 as we had a bit of diy and it did absolutely fine so the new one should be fine.and also what they test it with a similar to plaster dust so i am sure it's.because the cyclones ur so effective enough so to stop it getting clogged.
 
Awesome concept!

This is arguably the biggest advancement in the history of vacuum cleaners. I love the idea of not having to maintain ANY filters! People are often unaware that there are filters in their bagless vacuums that either A) need to be washed and let air dry for at least 24 hours, or B) have to be thrown out and replaced with a new filter, which can get expensive!

Getting rid of the filters is a HUGE leap forward in vacuum technology!
 
Wet Dust Cannot Fly. Rexair (Rainbow) has been making vacuums that don't lose suction and maintain 100% airflow since 1936. The original models work exactly the same as the modern models do. The Rainbow can be put away as clean as the dishes, no dirt in it or on it. No odor of last week's dirt either. A Dyson is always dirty inside, where the fine dust collector is. Emptying a Rainbow (into the sewer go all the dust and germs) is a sanitary experience. You cannot breath dust that has been drowned in water. The Rainbow also humidifies the air while it cleans (didn't Dyson just bring out a humidifier?). And, the best part, is the Rainbow is and always has been, Made In The USA!. The ten seconds in front of a sink, placing two quarts of pure, clean water into the basin is nothing compared to the benefits of a truly clean and fresh home.

dysonman1-2015010909243602999_1.jpg
 
Tom, on the subject of Rainbow, can you tell me if the Rainbow has any filters? Is there a filter up inside the machine, above the water tank at all?
 
Out of all the Dysons I have owned, only one died of plaster dust. The DC05. I have vacuumed up plater with a DC04, DC14, DC24, DC25, DC08, DC05 and DC01. All survived except from the 05.

With the dc08, it had been used for plaster dust, saw dust, nails, screws etc and been bashed around with NOO filter washes. I got annoyed with the filter getting dusty, so I took the filter out and vacuumed. The post motor filter captured ALOT of the plaster dust. The motor never died. Then the machine got tilted up when I pulled the hose, the bin was upside down, the dust went through the shroud, through cyclones and into the motor. Still never died. Then I left it in the garden for 4 months. In snow and rain it just sat there. Then I took it home and tried it. The only thing broken was the switch. I out in another one and turned it on. The motor still worked as expected from a dyson...
 
The new Big Ball may not have any filters in it, but I'll bet there will be lots of service calls because people will will ignore the warning label and suck up plaster dust and the cyclones will frequently get clogged.
 
Rainbow

Great points about Rainbow. I like the looks of the new Dyson machine but it does grind my gears that Dyson claims to be the first. And no, The rainbow has no filter above the water basin. The separator is Rainbow's magic compiment. Machines since the original E Series do have post motor filters.
 
Dyson also claims "That no other vacuum expels cleaner air" and "The Dyson Cinetic Big Ball vacuum has whole machine HEPA filtration. No other vacuum
expels cleaner air. Dyson Cinetic™ science captures allergens and bacteria. And the whole system is engineered to be completely sealed – ensuring no dirty air escapes" and "By capturing the dust that clogs all other, Only Dyson Cinetic science doesn't lose suction."

I don't what to think of those claims, because they're saying their other vacuums that they brag about never losing suction and having the best filtration do lose suction and do expel dust and other allergens.
 
Sorry Josh, but what are you trying to get at? Nobody has said you CAN suck those things up with a Rainbow? People were making the point that Dyson are claiming that this is the worlds first filter free vacuum and that's not true - Rexair/Rainbow have been going since the 30's.

Just like when the DC01 came out, Dyson claimed it was the worlds first bagless vacuum, but that wasn't true either....Rexair & Filter Queen were around long before Dyson.
 
i was talking about older replies. people were saying if new dyson can suck up plaster dust when it says not to that there is other machines that say not to.
 
^yes but nobody said you could! It's a flaw to owning a Rainbow, but just because that cleaner has a flaw doesn't mean it's ok for another to do so. And people know that, hence nobody disputed it. What people are correct with is Dyson's false "we are the first" claim, but you can't justify that by making another argument about a different factor altogether, that just doesn't work.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top