Need Info on Kenmore Progressive

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Seems to be the pickups (brushes?) where the moveable part of the reel connects to stationary wires. If I wiggle or squeeze the moveable part of the reel, the resistance reading goes wild. I was going to attempt to disassemble, but I'm concerned about unleashing the spring.
Replacement cord reels are all over ebay.
 
But it could be mostly fixed for free.
Anyone here with experience in Electrolux repair would tell you to take out a life insurance policy before even thinking about opening up a Electrolux cord reel. o_O


Other brands are likely less serious, but those spring tensioners are wound extremely tight.
 
Sears Parts Direct sells the cord with the contact ring attached. Accessing the contact ring might not require unwinding the spring. Or it might be one of those deals where you count the rotations as you let the reel unwind before disassembly. When putting it back together you assemble it with the spring slack and then turn the reel with the cord wound around it the same number of turns it took to unwind it.
 
You know that's something that irks me. I see it a lot in Electronics forums. I follow a five page post about the problem I'm having, and after all that reading about trial and error it just goes dead -- no conclusion. What's the point? I feel the whole idea of a forum is so that your path to the solution is now documented, and available for all to refer to. It becomes a reference book of collective knowledge. Ir saves people a lot of time and grief. I depend on Forums a lot.

Anyway Paul, I won't just consider posting my findings -- schematics, photos, conclusions -- I definitely will do it! I want people to benefit from my work, not just me. And Paul, thank you again for providing me with those videos. Each one had at least some piece of useful information.

With my success yesterday (with the red vac), I see now how I should approach the problem with the gray one -- without going the brute-force route. I'll dig into that as soon as I time to and report back.

RZ
You're very welcome, RZ. Congrats on your success!

We're definitely on the same page in regard to how electronics forums such as VL are at their best with active participation in sharing knowledge and ideas. Overall, I think we do well here, but consistency can waver as some bow out for awhile or only sporadically take part. I have done so myself from time to time; returning to find unanswered questions in archived threads that I could have either answered outright or researched. I have even found unanswered threads from years past that I have answered in case the person checks back or someone else needs the answer. I will have to say that my current access to a newspaper database and my increased familiarity with various websites has led me to answer more queries than only those of which I am personally interested and familiar.

I look forward to your follow-ups and other participation at VL. Again, welcome! :)
 
Hey Guys. The Red vac is up and running. I fixed the reel problem. I had been thinking along the same lines as C,W, when I saw his post.
Sears Parts Direct sells the cord with the contact ring attached. Accessing the contact ring might not require unwinding the spring. Or it might be one of those deals where you count the rotations as you let the reel unwind before disassembly. When putting it back together you assemble it with the spring slack and then turn the reel with the cord wound around it the same number of turns it took to unwind it.
I carefully unwound the reel counting revolutions, until it was fully "relaxed". There is one screw that holds the actual reel to its frame. The spring is completely contained by a separately affixed plate on the other side of the reel. (Don't touch those screws!) Once the reel is off the frame, the contact fingers and slip rings are exposed and accessible. I tried contact cleaner, etc, and it made some improvement, but the resistance readings were still not stable. I was blessed to find a scrap of crocus cloth in my tool box, and I burnished the slip rings and the contact points of the fingers. I also carefully bent the fingers to increase tension against the rings. I did this in small increments several times -- re-assembling the reel (onto the frame) each time and taking resistance measurements -- until i got it to be rock solid. I wound the reel the "required" number of times, remade the opened crimp connections, and tested it out. Ran fine, even while I "played" with the reel. Fixed! Thanks to all for sharing your ideas and suggestions.

The above description is a little brief. I'm thinking of making a separate more detailed post on how to fix the reel -- complete with a few pix. What do you think?

Also, while I had the vac apart, I took pictures, and drew a wiring diagram of the whole thing. (I never did find the "tiny" wiring diagram.) Another separate post?
 
Thanks, but don't have both going yet. The gray one still needs work. But it's next on the queue.

Years ago I had to fix two drop light wind-up reels. Not at all like this. On one I remember using C-clamps and a vise-grip pliers to keep it "contained". That one went well. The other one was a loss. It didn't become airborne, but I did wind up with a pile of "ribbon", as someone earlier said. I always wore either googles or nowadays, a face shield when "working" on these things.
 
Hey Guys. The Red vac is up and running. I fixed the reel problem. I had been thinking along the same lines as C,W, when I saw his post.

I carefully unwound the reel counting revolutions, until it was fully "relaxed". There is one screw that holds the actual reel to its frame. The spring is completely contained by a separately affixed plate on the other side of the reel. (Don't touch those screws!) Once the reel is off the frame, the contact fingers and slip rings are exposed and accessible. I tried contact cleaner, etc, and it made some improvement, but the resistance readings were still not stable. I was blessed to find a scrap of crocus cloth in my tool box, and I burnished the slip rings and the contact points of the fingers. I also carefully bent the fingers to increase tension against the rings. I did this in small increments several times -- re-assembling the reel (onto the frame) each time and taking resistance measurements -- until i got it to be rock solid. I wound the reel the "required" number of times, remade the opened crimp connections, and tested it out. Ran fine, even while I "played" with the reel. Fixed! Thanks to all for sharing your ideas and suggestions.

The above description is a little brief. I'm thinking of making a separate more detailed post on how to fix the reel -- complete with a few pix. What do you think?

Also, while I had the vac apart, I took pictures, and drew a wiring diagram of the whole thing. (I never did find the "tiny" wiring diagram.) Another separate post?
Bitchen ! Good job.
 
You know that's something that irks me. I see it a lot in Electronics forums. I follow a five page post about the problem I'm having, and after all that reading about trial and error it just goes dead -- no conclusion. What's the point? I feel the whole idea of a forum is so that your path to the solution is now documented, and available for all to refer to. It becomes a reference book of collective knowledge. Ir saves people a lot of time and grief. I depend on Forums a lot.

RZ
Usually what happens is the fix worked and they went on with their life and forgot about the topic, or the fix failed and they got so humiliated they gave up and binned the appliance and never came back again. Or they opened it up, said "this is too much work" and then binned it. It's a 50/50 shot.
 
Hey people. Hope you all had a good holiday. Between the holiday prep and some plumbing issues, the focus came off the vac stuff. I finally did get to do some looking at the "gray" vac. It turns out that it's the kind with "Electronic Touch Control" on the wand. That's why it has that complex circuit board. It's actually a whole different animal. The wiring, even within the hose, is completely different. Because it is so different, I'm going to start a new thread for it. But first I want to do a bit more investigation on it. Anybody familiar with that kind? RZ
 
Hey people. Hope you all had a good holiday. Between the holiday prep and some plumbing issues, the focus came off the vac stuff. I finally did get to do some looking at the "gray" vac. It turns out that it's the kind with "Electronic Touch Control" on the wand. That's why it has that complex circuit board. It's actually a whole different animal. The wiring, even within the hose, is completely different. Because it is so different, I'm going to start a new thread for it. But first I want to do a bit more investigation on it. Anybody familiar with that kind? RZ
Hello. First question is to find out which generation Progressive you have. Does yours have the cubby in the back for the Pet Powermate and three contacts from the hose to the canister, or is it the first gen Progressive with four full size attachments under the lid and four contacts from the hose to the canister?
 
Hey CW. Happy New Year. Thanks for your offer of assistance. Sorry I never got back to you until now. It's that post-holiday cleanup/put-away that kept me off-line. Just for the record this "gray" vac is one with the cubby in the back for the Pet Powermate and three contacts from the hose to the canister.

I had already verified the motor was good. After studying that "fancy" circuit board (with two Triacs, and some ICs -- including a micro-controller) and taking some static (ohmmeter) measurements, I decided the circuit board wasn't the problem. So it had to be the hose/wand. Taking static measurements on the hose indicated a lack of continuity. I took apart the swivel elbow. The slip rings was covered with greasy lint. Cleaned that up, but measurements still not good. Then I took apart the handle (where the push buttons are), and found two of the three hose wires were not connected. They are supposed to push into these connectors that are crimped onto the wires in the handle. They didn't stay pushed in. I trimmed off a bit more insulation, pushed them in again, and gave them a tight squeeze with a crimping tool. Now they're solid. Redid my static measurements, and now they were sensible. Plugged the hose into the canister. put the line cord into an outlet, and pressed the On (labelled Carpet High) button. It roared to life. All the other buttons worked too.

I noticed one remaining issue. The On button sometimes only just gives the motor a kick, depending on how you press it.. This is the button that gets all the use -- probably hard use. Either the switch is worn, or there a break in the solder or the foil land. (I did notice the little circuit board with the switches flexes a bit when the button is pressed.) I'm going to re-flow the solder, or if the switch itself is the problem, swap it with the medium speed switch.

Thanks again for the help and support. By the way, I did draw a wining diagram, and made a table of what the static hose measurements should be -- including what the reading should be for each button press. I can post those once I clean them up, if you think it would be useful. RZ
 
Hey CW. Happy New Year. Thanks for your offer of assistance. Sorry I never got back to you until now. It's that post-holiday cleanup/put-away that kept me off-line. Just for the record this "gray" vac is one with the cubby in the back for the Pet Powermate and three contacts from the hose to the canister.

I had already verified the motor was good. After studying that "fancy" circuit board (with two Triacs, and some ICs -- including a micro-controller) and taking some static (ohmmeter) measurements, I decided the circuit board wasn't the problem. So it had to be the hose/wand. Taking static measurements on the hose indicated a lack of continuity. I took apart the swivel elbow. The slip rings was covered with greasy lint. Cleaned that up, but measurements still not good. Then I took apart the handle (where the push buttons are), and found two of the three hose wires were not connected. They are supposed to push into these connectors that are crimped onto the wires in the handle. They didn't stay pushed in. I trimmed off a bit more insulation, pushed them in again, and gave them a tight squeeze with a crimping tool. Now they're solid. Redid my static measurements, and now they were sensible. Plugged the hose into the canister. put the line cord into an outlet, and pressed the On (labelled Carpet High) button. It roared to life. All the other buttons worked too.

I noticed one remaining issue. The On button sometimes only just gives the motor a kick, depending on how you press it.. This is the button that gets all the use -- probably hard use. Either the switch is worn, or there a break in the solder or the foil land. (I did notice the little circuit board with the switches flexes a bit when the button is pressed.) I'm going to re-flow the solder, or if the switch itself is the problem, swap it with the medium speed switch.

Thanks again for the help and support. By the way, I did draw a wining diagram, and made a table of what the static hose measurements should be -- including what the reading should be for each button press. I can post those once I clean them up, if you think it would be useful. RZ
Indirectly you answered my original question. Since you have the three wire hose you have the second gen Progressive. I have the exact same machine in dark gun metal gray. There was also a version with a different main board and a sliding speed control on the handle. Those came in a beautiful shade of yellow. Naturally I have that one too.

You are much more electrically adept than I am but like you I too have found those hose wires disconnected on Kenmores. Swapping hoses is one of the first things I do now when I have a Kenny that won't start but I have an example of almost every kind of Kenmore hose that makes this possible to do. Glad you found the problem. I like these vacuums.

Hot tip. The wheels on your power nozzle are pressed on and roll plastic against plastic. They wear and will eventually fall off. Crappy Panasonic design. Unusual for Panasonic but there you are. The nozzle base used on the basic power nozzle Kenmore sells with the 200, 400 and some 600 Series canisters, also sold by Titan with the T9000 canister and by Cen Tec as the CT16QD was updated by the current manufacturer, Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co Ltd with the wheels now spinning on steel axles. Yay. Problem fixed. The new base is a direct swap for what you have now. Everything drops right in, your existing upper cover snaps and screws into place and no more wheels falling off. I've done two such conversions already with more to come.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top