Once again an honest response to a dishonest question results into veiled insults from the self-appointed vacuum god.
You have shown nothing convincing to support your claim 'american' carpets are different, which is being used to poo-poo evidence and data you don't want to be true. Showing a mere photo of one carpet is less than I'd expect a child to provide as a response. At the very minimum, I'd expect a thorough investigation showing the wide range of carpets and their properties from both the US and then elsewhere around the world to clearly quantify aerodynamically relevant differences exist in statistically significant samples. Then some empirical evidence conducted professionally to confirm these differences are relevant and directly affect conclusions from like-testing. In other words, do some actual work to produce something respectable and believable. No one intelligent who isn't gullible has any reason to believe your claim. The onus is on YOU to do this if you wish to support your claim and appear respectable now and going forward. I've no hope, especially with that kind of response you gave. o_o
I am not claiming they are different. I simply provide an example of a "typical" USA carpet. I have no idea what a typical UK carpet consists of.
Then you've wasted everyone's time and not made yourself looked good because no one asked for a "typical" USA carpet. You're getting more attention than is warranted.
American carpets tend to be thicker and deeper pile wise, whereas British carpets are very short pile, kinda like commercial carpeting you see in offices and other professional settings.
Then by all means put me back on your blocked list.
I provide "evidence" on what a typical USA carpet is like, and as I should have known, I would be berated and insulted for doing so.
I've seen no evidence to show this is a universally true statement. Happy to receive the evidence. No reason why this should affect a relative comparison either. I test on the same thick pile carpet (20+ mm). There are such a wide range of carpet types and these obviously exist universally. This is also why industry standards do what they do to account for this (people can go read if they're interested in details). There is no such thing as an "american" carpet as absurdly claimed earlier. There is just carpet and they're all different. The key differences are covered in my lecture video associated with how they affect relevant aerodynamic factors for anyone genuinely interested in avoiding being misled.
Google Gemini 2.5 Pro but corrected by human intervention said:
Which argument?
Where is anyone claiming a "universally true" statement, besides yourself of course?
So, once again, we are all expected to take VF word as gospel, but any other form of evidence is hogwash.
I'd love to see the statistically significant data you've used to draw that conclusion, respectably—distinct from some cowboy-like claim based on feelings and no real objective data whatsoever.
Your experience isn’t “statistically significant.”
Thanks for confirming what I suspected. The statement was not based on sufficient evidence to be credible and is no different to a subjective opinion.
I'm laughing and shaking my head because V-F has no hands on repairing and servicing vacuums and no hands on with vacuums from brands like Sebo, Miele, Lux International or Electrolux AB, Bosch, Lindhaus, Faker, Sattrap or any of the brands sold in North America like Eureka, Bissell, Sanitaire, Aerus, Cirrus, Titan or Kenmore. But he can dismiss with a wave of the hand any knowledge someone else brings to the table as automatically insufficient. That is arrogance at its worst.
To be convincing and respectable, you should understand the level of statistically significant data you need and provide the study and data to support your claim. You have simply failed to do that, allowing anyone who understands anything about the real world to determine that your factual claim was nothing more than a subjective feeling masquerading as a truth. This resulted directly in the total loss of credibility and confidence in your output going forward. That's unfortunate for you but is entirely your own doing.
Let’s apply your standards to your tests then shall we?
Notice the total lack of specific detail and clear, focussed example of a factual claim from my channel not backed up by the evidence. The specific tests, the specific data, why it's apples-to-apples in context of the previous comment. All absent. All vague. All run-of-the-mill smear. People can review my channel, the claims made, and the data supporting them for themselves and make up their own minds without petty projections in the form of unconstructive, vague hate waffle.
Essentially all of what you claim. Your tests/results/conclusions (ahem, "facts") are not generated from scientific study, but any thought, opinion, test result, comment, observation that disagrees with you must absolutely be rock solid scientifically vetted.
I would love to find one of your "factual claims" that fit the bill, but you ask an impossible task because none such exists.
