Why is it taking Kirby so long

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

They might be able to come up with a more convenient attachment system and/or a long-life belt. And maybe they could come up with a variant fan that generates a bit more working vacuum, like some of the later Royals, or a more aggressive brush roll, but that would just be tinkering around the edges.

OTOH, there's room for Filter Queen to update their design a bit more while keeping the form factor.
 
Kenny - Yes, I agree! The cleaning performance isn't the issue, it's the design of the product. Yet they have their hands tied behind their back a bit because they also can't deviate from the design too much.

Eric - Yes, they could improve the fan or brushroll. But the carpet cleaning performance is already excellent. That's not the issue. The issue here is making the Kirby convenient to use and fit into today's modern homes and consumer's lifestyles.

I think the answer could lie in the Royal design. Eliminate the flat belt and center motor pulley, make a powerhead with the motor on top or behind the brushroll housing, with a geared belt. Or, possibly incorporate a design like the Kenmore/Panasonic Direct Drive brushroll with the motor in the middle. Replace the belt lifter assembly with a metal cap that removes to insert and remove the hose for above the floor cleaning. On the front of the handle, design a tool caddy to hold a dusting/crevice/upholstery tool, and on the back incorporate a stretch hose. And then a additional long hose and tool caddy like they do now for those consumers that prefer a non stretch hose. As for the machine's filtration, if they made the motor vent on the side by the height adjustment a little bit bigger & incorporated a Miele AirClean cloth microfibre type material to capture carbon dust from the motor, and if they either improved the outer bag material for added filtration, or made a hard case outer shell with a HEPA Filter for the bag, that would improve & modernize the Kirby's filtration. As for improving the floor cleaning, perhaps narrow the brushroll cavity a little bit, put a brushroll on/off switch somewhere on the powerhead, and change the powerhead baseplate to plastic or put some kind of soft touch material like velour or felt on it, so it would allevate consumer's concerns a metal baseplate would scratch wood floors.

The prototype Kirby we saw leaked years ago was nice, but was a bit too radical from the present design to be accepted by consumers. These changes would basically be a more tame redesign like that, but still styled like a traditional Royal/Kirby design while having some modern features added in.

As for Filter Queen, they have a couple options to modernize their design. Either ditch the paper filter cones for HEPA Cloth filter cones, or even better, replace it entirely with the Optima design they came out with years ago with HEPA Cloth bags. They nearly had it right, all they would have to do is redesign the motor intake in the bag housing so the bag wouldn't get sucked into it & inhibit airflow. Also, ditch the vents on the motor housing, put a longer handle on top, and add a HEPA Filter onto the blower port to modernize filtration. And of course that junky powerhead they use now would have to go!
 
Tech drive strains arms and back???NOT for me Easier in all counts!!!Like comparing a hand pushed mower over a self propelled one.I find my Kirby outdoes ANY of the clean air vacuums in my collection,Simplicity-Riccar and Sebo.And the Kirby works at 6A instead of 12.Also moves more air!!!I'll take the NSS M1 over ANY backpack!!!Moves the air-much like a Kirby.Has a larger bag and as it fills you aren't supporting it on your back.Backpacks ARE NOT for folks with back problems.
 
panasonicvac: "I just reached out to the Consumer Relations Manager at Kirby. Right now there isn't a new model planned to be released anytime soon. The design and engineering team are still working to develop a Kirby that's supposed to be proven overall better than it's predecessor. "

-----------------------------------------


Well that's good they are doing something, and it proves there is a new model coming (which was just speculation for the past many years). Let's just hope all of us will still be alive to see it now......

I can guarantee they will be making it lighter, that is the #1 complaint with Kirby vacuums. The other is the tool attaching. I still think if they can make the tool attachment feature some magnetic attachment system where it just clicks on and stays on - maybe some kind of diverter valve to switch from floor to hose - that would likely ease the conversion process and also would be an extra benefit to protect the fan blades from metal bits being sucked up.

It would be totally hilarious if their new design just ended up looking like the Bison, which was actually brilliant for that time period if it wasn't so poorly built.
 
I’m looking forward it seeing it I would like some sort of hose connection into the power head like the patents showed that would be cool
 
Assuming thats all true about the attach hose, how will they implement that function into using the system in other cleaning modes, like the shampooer, blower mode, ect?
 
Kirby should revert back to the 500 series...

specifically a modernized Dual Sanitronic 50 and ditch Tech Drive. Squeeze the 7A Gxx motor in the shell, keep the Amodel fan (even though Kirby fans, no pun intended, prefer the metal fans- the Amodel fans are superior in durability and that would be the main selling point for Kirby) and make a quad brushroll with beaters filling the space between the brush strips for maximum performance.

We've now made advances in materials science since the 1930s to trust a quality, high-impact resistant plastic to replace costly aluminum castings. This should bring the entry price of a Kirby down a bit. We already use plastic in the motor base since the Sentria II. The fancase, however, should be lined with steel.

The existing dry foam carpet shampooer doesn't clean carpets in the way that an extractor would, so it should be discontinued. On the other hand, with good engineering of the front bearing, bearing plate and motor seal in addition to a clean tank attachment with an electric pump (perhaps secured onto the handle shaft), a dirty tank attachment onto the exhaust horn, and a special nozzle with a shampooing brushroll and powerful spray jets, it may be possible to create a wet extractor system using the existing direct-air fan and motor, which would be superior to a dry foam system. The other advantage of implementing an extractor system is that the fan and fancase can be cleaned out through the extraction process.

Use the Heritage II-Legend mini emptor design to facilitate HEPA disposable bags.

D2D is dead, gradually stray away from that and start marketing this machine as a superior alternative to Dyson, Miele and other mass-market premium machines in performance and longevity, keeping the price as close as possible to the same level. Also start selling the unit through commercial and janitorial channels as a modern 500 series would make an excellent commercial machine and would fill the niche that Royal left. Every office, hotel, bank, school, etc. would benefit from a Kirby.
 
Amodel fans have problems with heat-If you use the hose on the Kirby in blower mode with the inflator tool-can cause the Amodel fan to melt or deform.Same thing will happen if you let the disposable bag get too full.Go back to the metal fan,PLEASE!
 
Honestly

I just wish that Kirby would buyout the designs, tooling, and molding from TTI so they can bring back the Royal metal uprights but rebrand them as Kirby. I've never found a direct air upright that cleans just as well or better than a Royal.
 
Based on how industries handle model-specific tooling and molds at the end of a model run, I'm afraid that the Royal tooling is probably long gone and scrapped. Otherwise we'd be seeing Royal knockoffs at this point as TTI would have sold the tooling to another company.
 
Back
Top