A return to the 500 series...
with lighter weight, more power, disposable bags, and the newer handle conversion, belt lifter, and exhaust configuration would have been the end of Kirby? Or the bagless OBT? It certainly was not the end of Dyson. I'm not fond of bagless, but to have been the first and the only for 17 years? The Kirby as it has been known would have been gone, but that does not not mean the name and the company would have vanished. Short sighted to assume that because something other than what you would have preferred had happened that it would have to mean the end of all that is. Is that not precisely the kind of illogic we battle in our daily lives?
And just because bagless vacuums are built as junk does not mean they have to be built as junk. Filter Queen has a prototype built by James Dyson. I have not seen it up close, however that does not mean it is automatically a piece of junk. The original Fantoms were decent vacuums, the first 500,000 to roll off the assembly line of Iona Canada. Use a better grade of plastic, a better height adjustment, a serpentine V belt, and a wider diameter hose and handle/wand. Put 50.00 more into the manufacture (it probably cost 25.00). They sold for 400.00 originally. It would have been possible to make them better, sold them door to door, and everyone make money. Could have been done, wasn't. It is what it is, but that doesn't mean it would have been the end of Kirby. The CMS sold for 1000.00! thru Amway.