UK Halloween Meet - The Cleaners

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Wow!

Thanks Mike for sending those pictures with me in! I've not seen them before but did check out the ones in the off-topic section last week; it looks as though you all had a great time, even though I wasn't there;)As for the marquee, that was a great idea; you just never know what the weather will do and it makes Al's place look like a stately home lol.

The Junior line ups look great and help and show some of the many variations over the years. I like the one showing the line up of 'coffee can' Hoovers, some of which I brought down 2 years ago.

I'm hoping to get a new camera for Christmas; the mode switch has failed on my old one and I can't seem to get a replacement. Perhaps I'll get organised in the spring and I can post a few line ups of my own stuff.

Hope to catch up with you all later!

Stephen
 
Great collections everyone!

"And note that I have paid attention to our own DysonAnimal so that I have not run the cleaners with the handles upright" Why is it a bad thing to run the machine while the handle is upright?

Thanks,

Joe
 
It isn't bad to run them in upright,

That wouldn't make any sense. In a Dyson, when the cleaner is upright, the suction is diverted from the head the the hose, unless is has something to do with the bursh-roll eating the rug?



 


-Alex.
 
Dyson

All the Dyson cleaners I know of take the suction off the cleaning head when stood upright. In newer 01 models and on all of the 03 I think, this was done by sealing off the suction completely, that is to say effectively blocking the airflow. This of course would cause the motor to overheat if left like it for long enough. The early 01 cleaners allowed air to escape from vents in the cleaning head when the machine was stood upright, but this required a valve in the hose socket and the design was so problematic that not only did Dyson stop fitting it, they also took it out of a good deal of cleaners which were sent back to the factory for repair.

On later models from 04 onwards, suction was diverted to the hose when the cleaner was stood up, but as all cleaners had caps over the hole in the wand, the potential was still there for the cleaner to overheat. I have not see the ball-style cleaners in much detail but I have been told that these cleaners allow the suction to carry on through the front of the cleaning head until the hose is removed. To be truthful, I cannot see what the problem was in having the suction running through the cleaner head when the cleaner was stood upright, but Dyson didn't like it, I expect.

However, how this applies to the vintage juniors in the picture, I am not sure.
 
Rug munching

All these years have passed and until I read a message on here last week, never once did I hear about the fringes of mats being refereed to as munched, or a cleaner being called a rug-muncher. But I can see where the term comes from, when one considers that the upright cleaners have always been capable of chewing the loose ends of carpets and rugs. This comes down to the brush roller of course, not the suction, which is why a good deal of cleaners are designed so that when the cleaner is upright, the cleaner head is lifted off the floor or the brushes stop turning, so as to not cause damage to carpets when the hose is being used.

Again, I don't see how this relates to the vintage juniors here as all of them would be in contact with the floor at all times, no matter what position the handle was in.
 
Old pictures

Thanks for all the nice comments on this old thread :)

Gary, is yours the one in this colour scheme or do you have the other version which has a body in similar colour to a Hoover Junior 119 and the burgundy bag?

John, I promise the idea was not stolen from you. It first happened in the first meeting I had in 2007 where there were quite a few Juniors and it was somewhere to put them all, sadly my house is nearly not so large as yours. After that it became a bit of a tradition to have the "stairway of Juniors" although I eventually ran out of stairs - and I don't even have examples of the all!

Now, regarding the comment about using the cleaners with the handles lowered. With all Hoover "bag in the back" cleaners prior to those with disposable bag (which continues the air path beyond the rear of the cleaner) when the handle is in the upright position the bag is held, with some tension, at a sharp right angle to the back of the machine - not only does this restrict the airflow it also puts pressure on this area of the bag and I don't doubt that this is another reason (along with the bag not being emptied every time it is used and the dust rotting the bag) why there are so few original bags around. If you look at every instruction book prior to the 638 you will see that the handle is always lowered when the attachments are in use. Now, I will admit this may not be quite as strong a consideration when using the Junior where the bag is not held under the same tension it seems to me that the same policy is practised, where the handle is lowered when attachments are in use, as shown below.

Al

vacbear58++6-16-2013-16-16-34.jpg
 
6525E

Joe

The effect on the 6525 would be much less pronounced for it has, as noted above, the bellows assembly which carries the airflow up into the bag. That said, it would be still worth doing for the air, instead of having a 90 degree turn if the handle was upright, would have an easier path (probably less than 45 degrees) if the handle was lowered. And, lets face it, good and all as it is as a carpet cleaner, it needs all the help it can get when tools are attached.

Al
 

Latest posts

Back
Top