Should I Trade An Electrolux Model G For A Hoover Custom Convertible?

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

For me I would never trade an Electrolux for a Hoover.

Electrolux quality surpasses the Hoover, I would dare say would also out clean the Hoover. If the Lux has a power head, I would find a newer power head and make sure the brush roll is replaced.

I have never appreciated the Hoover Convertibles and would take a Eureka any day. I do have several in my collection but would prefer to use the Model 28.

Just my opinion.
 
Model G Switch

Again, look at the AE AF or G switch then look at all later switches, the E Fand G used a spring loaded heavy duty snap type switch, the 1205 and later machines use a very cheap sliding switch that is 1/4 or less the size of the switch on the older machines.As for the motors, Elux had really good quality up until the Diamond J, The early Super J motors gave some problems also, but overall Electrolux has consistently put out a good product..Not to throw off on Hoover, The switches and motors they used up until the 70s were also great.
 
It is true, the Hoover model 28 vacuum is one

of the best, easiest to run/steer, etc. vacuums in the Hoover lineage.
I also believe that the 1060 is as well. Personally, for ME, nothing beats a Hoover Convertible. Some were made cheaper than others, but...............they are tried and true.
I've had to use Eurekas in the past (not at 103 William0, but in rectories ,etc. They're just not for me.
 
<a name="start_34116.370017"></a>As I mentioned earlier, Mr. McKee took exception with the perception of the G's superiority. That being said, if cheaper materials were used in successive models, it could be due to the increased cost of adding features such as the electric hose port and redesigned exhaust system.


 


If you'll read my earlier posts, I never said the G was the strongest motor and best cleaner. It's not about that. It's about design and build quality. I gave you some examples and unless you take apart a 1205 to see their switch, versus the G switch, you won't understand what I'm talking about. Another member backed  me up on that. Your logic seems circuitous. The G's hold substantially more value than all of their successors in online markets. There's a reason for that.


 


I won't give you any more reasons than I have previously posted. ALL my original arguments have been about keeping a G for the G's sake. If you'll notice, I have said absolutely nothing about the Hoover in question. To me, it was never an argument about the G versus the Hoover, but about the value, build quality, noise level and elegant design of the G itself. I have no educated opinions on the Hoover.


 


I know build quality as I've been working on small machines and electric motors since the early 60's. And I also know manufacturers shortcuts when I see them. Sometimes the shortcuts are novel and appropriate, but mostly they come into being for the bean counters and the bottom line.


 


I would finish by inviting you to break down a G into all its component parts and then side by side break down a 1205 in the same way. I have in the past and I'll stick to my previous statements.


 


Kevin


 


 
 
<a name="start_34116.370050"></a>Again, look at the AE AF or G switch then look at all later switches, the E Fand G used a spring loaded heavy duty snap type switch, the 1205 and later machines use a very cheap sliding switch that is 1/4 or less the size of the switch on the older machines.As for the motors, Elux had really good quality up until the Diamond J, The early Super J motors gave some problems also, but overall Electrolux has consistently put out a good product..Not to throw off on Hoover, The switches and motors they used up until the 70s were also great.


 


Copy that and thanks for the further clarification on the switch types. The Super J motors that were troublesome were a certain serial # range. The Elux factory had a fire and could not immediately continue with armature manufacture and briefly went out of house for armatures. They also stood behind all the bad motors, replaced them for free and added a sticker to the canister that guaranteed the motors for five yrs. The Diamond J motors were said to be bad in desert climates and/or troublesome in a small percentage of them.  I've restored a lot of Diamond J's for friends and relatives. I've never seen a bad motor in one and I also bought the entire system new back around '84.  I think it's a phenomenal cleaning model/system.  It's my go-to vac if I want to get serious about cleaning my house. Otherwise, I use a Connie to keep the hard floors touched up.


 


And my best G, well she's a princess and doesn't really need to prove herself anymore....


 


Kevin
 
Im going by

What Jimmy Martin told me about the Super J problems....He was working for Elux then, the problem was a vibration in the very first ones.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top