I find it intriguing from an engineering aspect and would like to have at least one in my collection as a piece of vacuum history. But from all the test I've seen people do I don't find it to be a big enough jump in airflow/suction power to justify the complexity. A single motor clean air machine (especially with a twin motor) seems to get 80-90% of the power whilst being much more simple internally. For everyday use I'd rather use something like a 7850 or my R20UP or my Simplicity S38.There is no advantage to tandem. It was a marketing gimmick invented by Tacony. The circuit boards in all of them were a huge problem. I know, I used to work at the factory for 10 years. I saw them throw a flaming radiance down the concrete stairs. I was standing right there. They hauled it outside and threw water on it. The Chinese motors that power the tandem air vacuums are garbage. Cheap to make. Constant broken fans in the direct air motor because the plastic they make the fan out of it so cheap. Again, ask me how I know. I guess the moral of the story is to never hire a vacuum cleaner collector to work in a vacuum cleaner factory, because he sees everything. The good, the bad, and the ugly. The engineers at the company were complete assholes.
Hell my Simplicity S38 has almost as much air flow while getting far more water lift. It's a shame Tacony got rid of that body style of canister, they we're far better than their successor