Pick your poison: Main equivalency!

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

What would you pick?

  • Samsung Bespoke AI Jet Ultra: Ultra-powerful, but wasteful and dupe-@$$ and easily expensive

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dreame Z30: Cheap shot for nice motor, cheap competitor to others

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • SEBO Balance A1: Poor man's Dyson Cyclone V10, made by a now-wrongly praised bagged maker

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lupe Pure: Anti-stick, cordless that just couldn't sustain it's existence or remaining innovation

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Henry Quick: Bagged, bagged, bagged, bagged and bagged as f#¢k, despite the iconic smiley face

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dyson V8 (any version): Reliable&light but too cheap+compromised to be able to fully main-equivalent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • eufy E20: Robot stick that can barely do any job at all except for its space-saving

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cheap-@$$ knockoffs of advanced stuffs that doesn't do halfway as well as any of the real deal

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2

Absolute Rainbow

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 8, 2025
Messages
143
Location
Vietnam
We have a bunch of advanced vacuums that has at least one significant flaws that hold them back relative to current perfection, or maybe just greatness at the moment. The choices are in this poll itself.

(Excuse me for the censoring in the options though...)
 
Not on the list, but if I were to get a cordless vacuum, I would get one that fits in my existing tool battery ecosystem (Makita, Milwaukee, Ryobi, etc).

I wouldn't be surprised if those performed worse than some on your poll, but you are already getting inferior performance by choosing cordless anyway, so performance wouldn't be my primary consideration for choosing a cordless. I'd rather just choose from something that doesn't add another expensive and wasteful battery that will lose capacity over time and eventually fail.

*edit* Any reviewers out there that have tested mainstream cordless vacuums vs some of the tool brand ones?
 
Not on the list, but if I were to get a cordless vacuum, I would get one that fits in my existing tool battery ecosystem (Makita, Milwaukee, Ryobi, etc).

I wouldn't be surprised if those performed worse than some on your poll, but you are already getting inferior performance by choosing cordless anyway, so performance wouldn't be my primary consideration for choosing a cordless. I'd rather just choose from something that doesn't add another expensive and wasteful battery that will lose capacity over time and eventually fail.

*edit* Any reviewers out there that have tested mainstream cordless vacuums vs some of the tool brand ones?
Tool brands count towards the "knockoffs" option, the last one. @Hatsuwr, that means you chose the knockoffs. I expect you to vote accordingly.
 
Tool brands count towards the "knockoffs" option, the last one. @Hatsuwr, that means you chose the knockoffs. I expect you to vote accordingly.

Your descriptor of the option is a bit much for me to agree with lol. The poll would have been better without the commentary in the list. There's only one vote so far - maybe remake it?

If you do remake it, I'd add an option for tool brands, and change "knock-off" to other. Also, does Kirby even have a cordless? And why no Dyson Gen5detect or V15 Detect? Any what about Shark? Maybe add their Stratos and PowerDetect.
 
Your descriptor of the option is a bit much for me to agree with lol. The poll would have been better without the commentary in the list. There's only one vote so far - maybe remake it?

If you do remake it, I'd add an option for tool brands, and change "knock-off" to other. Also, does Kirby even have a cordless? And why no Dyson Gen5detect or V15 Detect? Any what about Shark? Maybe add their Stratos and PowerDetect.
NGL, the commentary is unnecessary and EXTREMELY biased.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top