Hi All,
I reach out for advice here. My 90-year-old great-grandfather is in need of a new vacuum cleaner (and he wants BRAND NEW). His 2-bed, 1 bath home is almost all hard floors; there is only one room with wall-to-wall low pile carpet and there are a few good-sized area rugs scattered throughout. While I am loyal to Aerus/Electrolux, Rainbow and Oreck, the lack of any major carpet (save one thick area rug) and his desire to have ONE easy-to-use machine to do floors, rugs and furniture definitely eliminates any Rainbow or Oreck, and the Aerus Guardian upright is not available around here for less than $1200. Also, he is 90, and we are in the process of hiring him a twice-monthly housekeeper, so ease of use and ease of maintenance is key for both parties here. I've been comparing machines online and have narrowed my options to a couple of machines.
The first machine up for consideration is the Dyson Ball 2 MultiFloor. Let me be clear that I'm not really a Dyson fan, but this machine really does fit the bill. Washable filters, bagless, easy to maneuver, brushroll shutoff and a simple, no-bull attachment kit and setup. His home is a one-level "typical 1960s" ranch, so the 15 lbs. carrying weight isn't too much of an issue.
Machine number two up for consideration is the Miele U1 Maverick. This is the current incarnation of the S7 Twist. This machine also fits the bill for the ability to clean hard floors and minor carpeting, as well as a not-extremely-complicated attachment setup. The only caveat I can find with this machine is the fact that bags are expensive, and I've also seen pictures/read reviews that disclosed some durability issues with the hose. Also, filters and other replacement parts aren't cheap, and they also have reports of being clog-prone.
Machine number three is the Numatic Henry. Again, great for hard floors and low pile carpet, and can easily be paired with the excellent VacuFlo TurboCat for the carpet/rugs if the suction head isn't enough. Attachments are also easy to use and the mechanical cord reel is bulletproof. The biggest caveat here is bag/parts availability; Numatic domestic machines and parts/spares are only available online through a handful of retailers in the USA.
All three machines fall into the $350-$450 price range. I will admit that I admire the Dyson for its maneuverability and the Numatic for its straightforward, no-bull design. The Miele is still a contender, but I'm wary of the collapsing hose issue. A $449 vacuum shouldn't have that problem.
So...your thoughts? All brand bias aside, which machine is best in this case??
I reach out for advice here. My 90-year-old great-grandfather is in need of a new vacuum cleaner (and he wants BRAND NEW). His 2-bed, 1 bath home is almost all hard floors; there is only one room with wall-to-wall low pile carpet and there are a few good-sized area rugs scattered throughout. While I am loyal to Aerus/Electrolux, Rainbow and Oreck, the lack of any major carpet (save one thick area rug) and his desire to have ONE easy-to-use machine to do floors, rugs and furniture definitely eliminates any Rainbow or Oreck, and the Aerus Guardian upright is not available around here for less than $1200. Also, he is 90, and we are in the process of hiring him a twice-monthly housekeeper, so ease of use and ease of maintenance is key for both parties here. I've been comparing machines online and have narrowed my options to a couple of machines.
The first machine up for consideration is the Dyson Ball 2 MultiFloor. Let me be clear that I'm not really a Dyson fan, but this machine really does fit the bill. Washable filters, bagless, easy to maneuver, brushroll shutoff and a simple, no-bull attachment kit and setup. His home is a one-level "typical 1960s" ranch, so the 15 lbs. carrying weight isn't too much of an issue.
Machine number two up for consideration is the Miele U1 Maverick. This is the current incarnation of the S7 Twist. This machine also fits the bill for the ability to clean hard floors and minor carpeting, as well as a not-extremely-complicated attachment setup. The only caveat I can find with this machine is the fact that bags are expensive, and I've also seen pictures/read reviews that disclosed some durability issues with the hose. Also, filters and other replacement parts aren't cheap, and they also have reports of being clog-prone.
Machine number three is the Numatic Henry. Again, great for hard floors and low pile carpet, and can easily be paired with the excellent VacuFlo TurboCat for the carpet/rugs if the suction head isn't enough. Attachments are also easy to use and the mechanical cord reel is bulletproof. The biggest caveat here is bag/parts availability; Numatic domestic machines and parts/spares are only available online through a handful of retailers in the USA.
All three machines fall into the $350-$450 price range. I will admit that I admire the Dyson for its maneuverability and the Numatic for its straightforward, no-bull design. The Miele is still a contender, but I'm wary of the collapsing hose issue. A $449 vacuum shouldn't have that problem.
So...your thoughts? All brand bias aside, which machine is best in this case??