My DC41 MK2. I must be mad!

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Is that picture it on the Argos catalogue and it shows how much suction it's got at the cleaner head how they get great pick up because they focus most of suction at the head.
 
I would say the dyson diffidently has more hose suction that the Vax. The Felix with an empty bag has very good suction as well. I know these can vary according to the diameter of the hose as well as the actual air watts of the vacuum. With the felix of course, as the bag fills, the suction does deteriorate. Not considerably but there is a differences and you can tell.

The dyson has not lost suction at all, and even after vacuuming up sawdust and plaster with it the other week, not a spec of evidence is found on the filter. I wouldn't usually vacuum such things up, but I trust the dyson filtration system. I will also add the post motor filter has not got any signs of carbon dust on it either.
 
Hey olive oil tinfoil how is the filter and yours is it still spotless. Cycling to just fantastic and never seen a cycling machine to filter out so much dust since finally made a machine that can agitate carpet and have a sufficient site can't actually separate the dust and dirt
 
Wow, I am impressed with the new radial root cyclone technology! Cinetics are a bit over the top, but this is also good
Our DC07 origin filter stays pretty clean even after months of use, and that is the first root cyclone machine from 2001... It is the updated model with the de rooted cyclone. Its loud but is a really powerful machine.
 
I am amazingly overwhelmed with the new Dyson, it seems fantastic!
Five year guarantee
Performance
Durability
Style
Filtration
Features
Wattage
Modern
Pets
In 21 years they made a hell of a jump from the classic old faithful dinosaur, the DC01 all the way to this new DC41. That is really impressive, cant wait to get one! I would also like a DC59 as. I imagine that would be very useful. I hope to get it soon whilst Dyson's offer is still on with the three free tools, I would choose the ZORN, soft dusting brush and flexi crevice tool
 
I'm not even sure what to do in this thread anymore, I just told you that I thought the DC65 was a decent bagless, even the best on the market! I can't even share your opinion without you throwing a fit! No matter what anybody says, you stick to your Dyson like it's life or death, why are you telling me to get a life when you're always there to stop anybody who says anything bad about Dyson! Like you said, there is no perfect vacuum, and their CERTAINLY isn't a perfect vacuumlander! 
 
Well, you must admit it is an effective tactic! If you can't beat a certain somebody's vacuum or what ever for that matter,  then ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK the person directly!
smiley-frown.gif
 
"198 AW, but its impressive how that vacuum was designed to make it work better than other machines with higher airwatts!"

...you mean like Hoover did for 80-odd years with the combination of the "beats, as it sweeps, as it cleans" brushroll and the dirty fan motor, giving superior carpet cleaning?

Yeh, real original there Dyson, bravo! The direct drive brushroll is also nothing new. The Panasonic Icon launched in 1998 was the first to feature that design, 15 years before Dyson.

Once again, nothing original from Mr. D at all.
 
Nice Vacuum

I really like that Dyson. I have a DC44 on its way in the mail for my quick pickups as I have the Dyson bug.

I wonder why the US DC65 doesn't have that slider? That is a really neat feature.

I may look at getting my church to upgrade to a DC65 as our DC25 has given us years of faithful service. (In a church. Teeheehee) People can say what they will about Dyson, but that DC25 had kept our Church's White, plush carpet looking very good for several years. It really pulls up a ton of dirt. The ball is awesome for maneuvering around the pews.
 
Supersweeper,

It isn't just this thread. On nearly every other thread you have participated in, you either constantly bash dyson or rave and rant about Kirbys. I, and very few other people don't go onto other similar threads such as this and say "the Kirby is rubbish, my sebo is better", or "My miele will outclean such and such". Maybe that might be the case. But you only seem content on either raving or bashing one vacuum cleaner or another. Other people on this thread have said things like they like it, looks like a nice vacuum, or I wish they did this or that, etc. That is fine, or if you don't like it, so what? That is a discussion! But the constant, repetitive same old is just irritating.

Your sarcasm when it comes to "inferior dyson" is to much its tacky. Look at what you have put. It is you particularly I am having a problem with, and others are as well. Just take it down a notch. I have said this a lot foo times now, have your opinion, express your opinion, but be mature and decent about it. Constantly bashing or raving one particular brand or another is repetitive and not interesting. We are supposed to be vacuum enthusiasts. Just like car enthusiasts, you can have brand loyalty but respecting and acknowledging that SOMETIMES, other manufactures make nice products as well is what its all about. Like I said, I have sebos, numatics, Bosch, Vax and Bissells and they are brilliant products.

I have criticised dyson in the past and will continue to do so. Not everything they make is wonderful, but a lot of their stuff is. That is just my opinion. Same as sebo, arguably the felix is their best model, however I don't think the X1.1 is as good as it cane be due to the automatic height adjustment.

Basically, be a bit more diverse !
 
To say that I know everyone thinks that Dyson don't put anyone Rubber plastic to protect hard floors if you have a look at the ball you can notice is a little bit squidgy on the lines is actually carnival and what about material on the lines and there is some on the whale at the bottom
 
<a name="start_26625.301919"></a>"Supersweeper, it isn't just this thread. On nearly every other thread you have participated in, you either constantly bash dyson or rave and rant about Kirbys. I, and very few other people don't go onto other similar threads such as this and say "the Kirby is rubbish, my sebo is better", or "My miele will outclean such and such". Maybe that might be the case. But you only seem content on either raving or bashing one vacuum cleaner or another. Other people on this thread have said things like they like it, looks like a nice vacuum, or I wish they did this or that, etc. That is fine, or if you don't like it, so what? That is a discussion! But the constant, repetitive same old is just irritating."



 


I completely agree with this. It does get annoying and why not post about Kirbys in threads about Kirbys?


 


Also, earlier on someone mentioned that a product would not be successful if it wasn't for clever marketing and advertising, while I do think advertising certainly boosts Dyson's sales, a product does not need to be heavly advertised to be sucsessful! Just look at Numatic, they don't advertise and never have done, yet Henry and his family are still the best selling vacuum cleaners in the UK!


 


Joe
 
I used my dyson today to do a right ol' clean through top to bottom. I find I can do it much quicker with the dyson than any other vacuum I have used, including my bosch athelt. The bosch, I can do a room in 2 or 3 minutes properly , but it is out of puff after two carpeted rooms, and I wish I was joking.

The fact everything is so at hand on the dyson, to grab the hose and snap on the combination tools, it is just so easy. I love it, and each time I use it, I find it very difficult to relate to the many drawbacks other people claim these dysons have.

That is true. A good product will sell itself, however that doesn't mean that a product that is advertised is only done so because they don't sell. Take the iphones. They are advertised more than any other phone yet they are sold more than any other phone. In the first week, they sold 15 million units, with no advertising. In fact the first advert I saw for the iPhone 6 was today, about 2 hours ago ahah!

Sometimes advertising is just making would be customer and current customers aware of new models.
 
LOL forget the iPhone 6, My kitchen phone is from 1984 and i couldn't be happier! 
smiley-tongue-out.gif



 


I just had an idea about merging the best of both worlds, imagine KIRBY but with the DYSON ball! that and the model 557 are planned as soon as i find some, um, "test subjects" willing to become the cutting edge of home vacuuming! 
smiley-tongue-out.gif



 


Yes, I have mentioned Kirby in other threads, and hope i haven't completely taken over a thread in the name of Kirby. in the event that i have, I apologize. don't forget that we have members that take over threads in Dyson's name, too, and that off-topic conversations can add variety and spice to a thread (I.E-The DC982 is coming out, let's compare it too other vacuums, and give opinions and facts and what not), and not (Hey look the DC928 is coming out, let's launch Kirby War XXVIV!). 
smiley-wink.gif
 
It is very true that not all products need advertising, however one must consider that the iPhone like Dyson, already have a loyal customer following. Plus with the internet one can do some quick research to see if and when a new product will be coming out. People were anticipating the release of the new iPhone, and the same can be said about video game systems, and video games their selves. Technology has always been the biggest seller and the top category of product to have such high anticipation and sells when a new model or device is released.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top