Miele Guard L1 vs old C3 - airflow through the hose?

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

eurekaprince

Well-known member
Bronze Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
4,844
Location
Montreal, Canada
Does anyone know if the airflow through the hose is worse or better on the Miele Guard L1 vs the old C3? What about the old C1 vs the new compact Guard S1? Curious as to whether the airflow is better on the old models. You really can’t beat the airflow on the old C3/S8 canisters.
 
Does anyone know if the airflow through the hose is worse or better on the Miele Guard L1 vs the old C3? What about the old C1 vs the new compact Guard S1? Curious as to whether the airflow is better on the old models. You really can’t beat the airflow on the old C3/S8 canister
A modern Kenmore 600 puts anything Miele makes to shame for airflow. 72 cfm at the hose end. No other vacuum from any manufacturer that I have measured can match that. The best Miele is around 60 cfm. The 600s attachments, hose and power nozzle are vastly better than anything Miele ever sold. I have some Mieles but basically hate using them, so I don't any more and my wife in particular loathes them. The hose is simultaneously too stiff and it has this built in curve that fights you and either kinks or it flips the canister over. I can't tell you how many times I watched my poor wife wrestle with that hose and end up with the canister on its side. Part of that is because the hose is too short ( Sebo, Kenmore, Patriot, Aerus, all have longer hoses ) and part of it is the material they use. A Sebo hose looks the same as Miele but is much nicer to use. Kenmore and Aerus hoses are entirely different, heavier but supple and they never fight you. Miele attachments are cruel joke, especially their pinche useless little dusting brush. Then you consider their treacherous bag dock and grossly overpriced bags and filters and this whole infatuation with Miele escapes me. Nein, danke.
 
Back
Top