So I have been testing my vacuum cleaners airflow performance since I got my airflow meter.
Turns out to be, that differences are very dramatic.
Most commonly the bagged vacuums have much more airflow than the bagless vacuums. I had to find out why.
Turns out that the cyclone system eats huge amount of airflow. You can see it when I test the Dyson DC40 cyclone system in the video.
This is almost upsetting, because the Dyson cyclones work extremely well.
Also Shark has low airflow, but not low as the Dyson and the motor is smaller.
Miele C3 has huge airflow and the Sebo Felix with the EU 700w motor is also good.
I just wanted to share some of my thoughts.
Turns out to be, that differences are very dramatic.
Most commonly the bagged vacuums have much more airflow than the bagless vacuums. I had to find out why.
Turns out that the cyclone system eats huge amount of airflow. You can see it when I test the Dyson DC40 cyclone system in the video.
This is almost upsetting, because the Dyson cyclones work extremely well.
Also Shark has low airflow, but not low as the Dyson and the motor is smaller.
Miele C3 has huge airflow and the Sebo Felix with the EU 700w motor is also good.
I just wanted to share some of my thoughts.