baglessball
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2011
- Messages
- 346
Energy efficiency
Well, these are my thoughts.
I have always thought that cold fill machines would be more efficient to heat up the water in the machine, as it saves all that hot water left and wasted in the pipe from the boiler, or hot water tank, to the washer.
I think the compromise for an energy efficient wash is a longer wash time. Instead of the machine using high amounts of water, electric and agitation to clean the fabric, it now relies on long periods of soaking to allow the detergent to do its work, rather than agitation. Which also results in less wear to the fabric.
If you want a short wash, i imagine the machine will be more active, whilst using more water through the cycle.
I can remember complaints made about Dyson machines stating that the high agitation and low water consumption caused more damage to textiles.
Well, these are my thoughts.
I have always thought that cold fill machines would be more efficient to heat up the water in the machine, as it saves all that hot water left and wasted in the pipe from the boiler, or hot water tank, to the washer.
I think the compromise for an energy efficient wash is a longer wash time. Instead of the machine using high amounts of water, electric and agitation to clean the fabric, it now relies on long periods of soaking to allow the detergent to do its work, rather than agitation. Which also results in less wear to the fabric.
If you want a short wash, i imagine the machine will be more active, whilst using more water through the cycle.
I can remember complaints made about Dyson machines stating that the high agitation and low water consumption caused more damage to textiles.