Hoover Vortex

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Vortex is only 2 screws for a belt change...

Given it has an OK motor I think its just let down by crap design and crap materials. Which is a shame as it should be better - its a 'hoover'!

I will do a direct comparison with a dc04 I have to see!
 
The Vortex must be quite rare because I've only seen one of them on the car boot so far but it was in a worse state than yours & they wanted a bomb for it too.
 
Thanks for the pics, Alex!

That contraption is mind-boggling!

You're right Bball, Hoover did say they used technology used in oil-separation to develop this model. Dyson called B.S., but clearly Hoover put a lot of effort into their first dual-cyclonic upright. Too bad about that pre-motor filter. I bet many suffered similar fates that Fantoms did in the US.

I found an ad for it!

 
These sold like hotcakes at the time, at least in my store. There were many customers who liked the bagless concept, but weren't quite "ready" for a Dyson, with it being a relative newcomer to the market and having such an unusual look. The Vortex gave them the features they wanted, but with a familiar brand name they already trusted, and styling they were more comfortable with. For every customer who is fickle and always searching for the next new thing, there is another who is more conservative and prefers to stick with what they know. Still true to this day, and will probably always remain so.

One of the biggest issues with the Vortex was its timing. It did indeed have several advantages over the DC01 and DC03, which gave it an edge for a very brief period, but those advantages were quickly overshadowed once the DC04 started appearing in full swing. Stole the thunder right out from underneath Hoover again, and that was before the patent row even started.

Me? I liked the Vortex, but could see from the get-go it was best suited to the type of customer who already goes out of their way to look after their things, and would maintain it religiously. It was certainly a lot less fussy than the Electrolux Cyclone Power, which would quickly choke with dust and fail no matter how much you pampered it. The only thing I wasn't particularly keen on was the fact that it was so top heavy, making it tiring on the arm. I don't think the location of the cord winder helped on that front, would have been better if they'd found a way to integrate it underneath the bin.
 
I do remember lots of people having them around 1999/2000. We couldnt afford one though so stuck with our trusty Lux Tango!

The cord winder on mine is a bit weak, wether its been like it since new or just got sloppy over the years I dont know. One has to feed it in as the weight of the plug and flex is too much. Will try to tweak it. Although if one pulls the cord you can feel it reach the end and give the cassette a yank too, imagine many failed because of this.

Anyone know that the random b&q white pipes are for in the hose inlet? May remove them and see if there is any change, surely it must restrict the airflow a tad?
 
Those "B&Q pipes"...

...are there for a reason: to adapt a circular cross-section of airflow to a more suitable flatter and smoother streamlined airflow entering the outer vortex chamber. Removing these pipes will introduce inefficient vortices around the rectangular opening.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top