alexhoovers94
Well-known member
Why people keep vacuums they don't like/hate just for the rareness, is beyond me!!
Hoover Vortex
- Thread starter beko1987
- Start date
Help Support VacuumLand:
alexhoovers94
Well-known member
[No message]
alexhoovers94
Well-known member
I just noticed, Sam...
My cyclone on my Vortex looks quite different.
My cyclone on my Vortex looks quite different.
suctionselector
Well-known member
Just a quick question...
... does the Vortex V2001 - red & black with S class filtration - have the original style cyclone unit that Dyson sued Hoover over, or is it the newer but less efficient style?
Just asking as I have won one of eBay, and I'm looking forward to it, as many positive things have been said about it, including it beating a DC01 performance wise.
Just slightly worried that I may have payed a tad much for it, but judging by the pictures it looks ok.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HOOVER-VO...Cleaners&hash=item43ca58398b&autorefresh=true
... does the Vortex V2001 - red & black with S class filtration - have the original style cyclone unit that Dyson sued Hoover over, or is it the newer but less efficient style?
Just asking as I have won one of eBay, and I'm looking forward to it, as many positive things have been said about it, including it beating a DC01 performance wise.
Just slightly worried that I may have payed a tad much for it, but judging by the pictures it looks ok.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HOOVER-VO...Cleaners&hash=item43ca58398b&autorefresh=true
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
beko1987
Well-known member
A few screws and you will find out!
Nearly ordered a genuine activator for £6 but stopped myself, it doesn't need it!
Nearly ordered a genuine activator for £6 but stopped myself, it doesn't need it!
suctionselector
Well-known member
Sam
Thank you, will be giving it a good clean and refurbish when collected (Sunday).
Thank you, will be giving it a good clean and refurbish when collected (Sunday).
alexhoovers94
Well-known member
Suctionselector...
If it says on the V2001 "Triple vortex system" then yes it will and I imagine it will have the efficient cyclone in it and not the later "Hurricane" style low efficiency cyclone.
If it says on the V2001 "Triple vortex system" then yes it will and I imagine it will have the efficient cyclone in it and not the later "Hurricane" style low efficiency cyclone.
suctionselector
Well-known member
Thanks Alex...
... glad to know that it's the earlier style one. What makes the filters different compared to the regular V2000, do they have a similar style filter to the S-class PurePower's?
... glad to know that it's the earlier style one. What makes the filters different compared to the regular V2000, do they have a similar style filter to the S-class PurePower's?
I find it quite hard to believe that the DC01 is less easier to use than a hoover triple vortex, the vac has a simple design really. 3 screws for a belt change, 2 rubber flaps under the back, a pullout filter, and a lift up post motor filter lid to see the filter and check it, just 1 button and the wand comes out, etc. I like the hoover though 
PS That refurbishment looks great Sam! hope it works much better afterwards
Tayyab
PS That refurbishment looks great Sam! hope it works much better afterwards
Tayyab
sebo_fan
Well-known member
Well, whilst I enjoyed playing about the DC01 when I had it, I was annoyed that the floor head had that adjusting pivot. Failed to get under beds too and was a major pain in the rear for maintaining carpet contact properly unless you constantly lower your back out via the handle.
I note the Vortex has manual height adjustment - so in theory, it should be better to control from the owner.
I note the Vortex has manual height adjustment - so in theory, it should be better to control from the owner.
beko1987
Well-known member
Vortex is only 2 screws for a belt change...
Given it has an OK motor I think its just let down by crap design and crap materials. Which is a shame as it should be better - its a 'hoover'!
I will do a direct comparison with a dc04 I have to see!
Given it has an OK motor I think its just let down by crap design and crap materials. Which is a shame as it should be better - its a 'hoover'!
I will do a direct comparison with a dc04 I have to see!
hi-loswitch98
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2013
- Messages
- 1,123
The Vortex must be quite rare because I've only seen one of them on the car boot so far but it was in a worse state than yours & they wanted a bomb for it too.
super-sweeper
Well-known member
being the Dyson fan,
You HAVE to protect a Dyson from being beat by 1 screw in a belt changing contest!
But guess what takes ZERO screws to change a belt....
You HAVE to protect a Dyson from being beat by 1 screw in a belt changing contest!
But guess what takes ZERO screws to change a belt....
henrydreyfuss
Well-known member
Thanks for the pics, Alex!
That contraption is mind-boggling!
You're right Bball, Hoover did say they used technology used in oil-separation to develop this model. Dyson called B.S., but clearly Hoover put a lot of effort into their first dual-cyclonic upright. Too bad about that pre-motor filter. I bet many suffered similar fates that Fantoms did in the US.
I found an ad for it!
That contraption is mind-boggling!
You're right Bball, Hoover did say they used technology used in oil-separation to develop this model. Dyson called B.S., but clearly Hoover put a lot of effort into their first dual-cyclonic upright. Too bad about that pre-motor filter. I bet many suffered similar fates that Fantoms did in the US.
I found an ad for it!
spiraclean
Well-known member
These sold like hotcakes at the time, at least in my store. There were many customers who liked the bagless concept, but weren't quite "ready" for a Dyson, with it being a relative newcomer to the market and having such an unusual look. The Vortex gave them the features they wanted, but with a familiar brand name they already trusted, and styling they were more comfortable with. For every customer who is fickle and always searching for the next new thing, there is another who is more conservative and prefers to stick with what they know. Still true to this day, and will probably always remain so.
One of the biggest issues with the Vortex was its timing. It did indeed have several advantages over the DC01 and DC03, which gave it an edge for a very brief period, but those advantages were quickly overshadowed once the DC04 started appearing in full swing. Stole the thunder right out from underneath Hoover again, and that was before the patent row even started.
Me? I liked the Vortex, but could see from the get-go it was best suited to the type of customer who already goes out of their way to look after their things, and would maintain it religiously. It was certainly a lot less fussy than the Electrolux Cyclone Power, which would quickly choke with dust and fail no matter how much you pampered it. The only thing I wasn't particularly keen on was the fact that it was so top heavy, making it tiring on the arm. I don't think the location of the cord winder helped on that front, would have been better if they'd found a way to integrate it underneath the bin.
One of the biggest issues with the Vortex was its timing. It did indeed have several advantages over the DC01 and DC03, which gave it an edge for a very brief period, but those advantages were quickly overshadowed once the DC04 started appearing in full swing. Stole the thunder right out from underneath Hoover again, and that was before the patent row even started.
Me? I liked the Vortex, but could see from the get-go it was best suited to the type of customer who already goes out of their way to look after their things, and would maintain it religiously. It was certainly a lot less fussy than the Electrolux Cyclone Power, which would quickly choke with dust and fail no matter how much you pampered it. The only thing I wasn't particularly keen on was the fact that it was so top heavy, making it tiring on the arm. I don't think the location of the cord winder helped on that front, would have been better if they'd found a way to integrate it underneath the bin.
beko1987
Well-known member
I do remember lots of people having them around 1999/2000. We couldnt afford one though so stuck with our trusty Lux Tango!
The cord winder on mine is a bit weak, wether its been like it since new or just got sloppy over the years I dont know. One has to feed it in as the weight of the plug and flex is too much. Will try to tweak it. Although if one pulls the cord you can feel it reach the end and give the cassette a yank too, imagine many failed because of this.
Anyone know that the random b&q white pipes are for in the hose inlet? May remove them and see if there is any change, surely it must restrict the airflow a tad?
The cord winder on mine is a bit weak, wether its been like it since new or just got sloppy over the years I dont know. One has to feed it in as the weight of the plug and flex is too much. Will try to tweak it. Although if one pulls the cord you can feel it reach the end and give the cassette a yank too, imagine many failed because of this.
Anyone know that the random b&q white pipes are for in the hose inlet? May remove them and see if there is any change, surely it must restrict the airflow a tad?
super-sweeper
Well-known member
conspiracy!
What if the pipe has nothing to do with the vacuum, and was simply a stuck clog!?
[Cue Twilight Zone theme!]
What if the pipe has nothing to do with the vacuum, and was simply a stuck clog!?
[Cue Twilight Zone theme!]
alexhoovers94
Well-known member
here is a video I made to show the cyclone efficiency
rolls_rapide
Well-known member
Those "B&Q pipes"...
...are there for a reason: to adapt a circular cross-section of airflow to a more suitable flatter and smoother streamlined airflow entering the outer vortex chamber. Removing these pipes will introduce inefficient vortices around the rectangular opening.
...are there for a reason: to adapt a circular cross-section of airflow to a more suitable flatter and smoother streamlined airflow entering the outer vortex chamber. Removing these pipes will introduce inefficient vortices around the rectangular opening.
beko1987
Well-known member
That's a good answer!
rolls_rapide
Well-known member
Thank you!
