Has anyone sued Dyson for false advertising?

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

You Are basting this off all machines are been discontinued and personally i do not like. And most machines you can get today are all mostly made up of the same plastic just made a little bit differently. Dyson DC 65 was tested against 98 different vacuum cleaners and tested against machines you can get easily get from the store or online or popular manufacturers. Those YouTube videos are made against machines are discontinued they are not the properly test I know those machines that testing against the Dyson will probably out clean it until both machines get into popular stores and online they Will be on the last thing on Dysons mind to test. And fantom Cycling technology is just old Dyson Technology The same technology was in the Dyson DC03 and I think DC04 and dc05 the greatest cyclone Technology you can get now is in the The nearest ones you can get today The best
you can Get In the DC 54 that has no filter.
 
The Fantom used a better motor and filtered better in cyclones due to it. I know Fantom used and licensed Dyson technology but I don't think any vac using it better implemented it than the Thunder. Bear in mind original Fantom models didn't use a filter, neither did the Rainbows. If you want a modern machine I know a current Dyson can't outclean a current Rainbow. It is more on brushroller and powerhead design. You can argue about costs but if the Rainbow costs three times as much it is money well spent, it probably will last three times as long. I'd hit a Fantom Thunder with a baseball bat and it probably would survive, a Dyson I'm nowhere near as comfortable about.

Now I've got nothing that much against Dyson, my main gripes are their advertising claims, cost and build quality. Industry standard tests are one thing, real world is another. It won't outclean a Kirby, Rainbow or many higher end vacs. They cost a lot for what you get. They aren't built terribly well. I just know if I was paying retail price, which I never do (a personal philosophy of mine), I wouldn't own a Dyson.
 
Well hitting a fantom with a baseball bat Dyson has done it Dysons done it that far worse than just a baseball I wouldn't do it to the old ones are the old ones would probably smashed to bits. Industry standard is like A home test The dust in the carpet and I see which one picks up more that's all it is they do test on multiple carpets and hard floor is not that different from A home test is just Dust in a carpet see what machines get much the dust out. Also is a video of the DC 65 against the newest Rainbow Vacuum is a bit of a carpet with the Dyson guys over with the rainbow Rainbow barely picks anything up after the Dyson.


 





 





 





 





 


 
It still picks up and thus in the vac after vac tests the second vac to go always wins because it picks up what is left behind.

All in home vac demos play on this. The last vac always still picks something left behind. You could empty the Dyson bin, wash it and still get something.

The Rainbow will likely outlast the Dyson if it is your primary vac, which has to be factored in, many unserviced D3 and D4 Rainbows, and various models of Kirbys that were made before Dyson are still running.
 
I know those machines and all out last Dyson Dyson is probably more likely to outlast vacuum you get from Amazon and Walmart places like that like that. dyson plastic vacuum you don't get the best lifespan out of them but you do get quite a good but not the best what are you going on about is Dysons the best machine you can get department store online any Bacchus machine and some bag machines.
 
I know that but I do not like the DC07 I am talking about the new ones how they are a lot better in the old ones.most people on here haven't got any of new ones.
 
You are constantly putting you interjections into threads about Dyson and like sebo_fan said, it is extremely annoying. Face up to it that there are members on here who have different feelings to Dyson other than your own. People want to knock down other members for there frequent posts about how Kirby is better in every thread and here you are doing it with Dyson. Face it, not everyone likes them.
 
Know everyone does not like Dyson I know that.someone will say to me about my post about Dyson no one say it to people won't stop coming on about Kirby and how is better than every else. I Only talk about Dyson when actually being talked about like this thread And A conversation is going on about Dyson.least I'm not going to every single theme and have to say something about Kirby and bash about Dyson no One will say anything about that.
 
Why Do people have to find problems with everything and have to upset people i've certainly been offended and I am quite upset
 
I was offended about the way you've carried on from reply 14 - stating tests as IF we can't all read.

As if many of the members how have never read it all before. Well before you, yourself has quoted it on here.

Its not news you're giving out here, but constant Dyson propaganda that doesn't add balance to weigh up your opinion or responses.

Speak from your own experience, rather than trying to use data.

Furthermore we don't have Walmart in the UK, so you can't judge what they sell just from what you read from other member's responses on here. That doesn't give weight to how you feel about Dyson, let alone brandish every model that either Amazon or Walmart sells as ""plastic vacuums" that don't last. You're only 14. You've got a lot more years to experience whether a Dyson can last for 10 years or more. Or any other brand.
 
 I know there is no Walmart in the UK I was standing from an American Point of view and in do you know what they sell as Theyvhave a website and I do have experience with how long manufacturers as my carer Had a Dyson DC05 for 15 years still works today And Had a vax for two years and it got completely destroyed on the same use of the DC05. You know what I will turn down the dyson setting please just Drop it got enough stress as it is.
 
I'm with the man here, yay team Fantom! Nobody used the technology better, except Amway as a runner-up! My Thunder always impresses, never flicks dirt back onto your feet like my DC14 did! I love the thing, and I buy them whenever I see them! 
smiley-laughing.gif
 
DC07

It is actually a better machine than a lot of what they are producing now, assuming you keep the upper cyclone assembly from getting clogged. It has its issues, but it isn't junk. The DC33 by contrast is downright fragile. The newer stuff doesn't seem much better, I've got a broken ball at work, the ball wheel cracked right off.

While the Fantom Thunder is long discontinued and not styled as well it is a far sturdier machine, otherwise 20 year old ones wouldn't still be running. These aren't collectors either, these are daily drivers. I see more running Thunders than DC07s.

Unless Dyson sees fit to market higher end commercial stuff these are high end discount store machines. Better than a $100 Dirt Devil? Yes. Better than a Kirby, Rainbow, Miele etc. No.
 
The Rainbow vs Dyson--Lets do the 52 strokes over the same area the Dyson did with the Rainbow-bet you will get more dirt in the Rainbow.A better test is to do one side of your floor with the Dyson-equal number of passes-then the other side with the Rainbow-equal number of passes.Then we can truely see which vacuum is the winner.Like other guys-feel the Rainbow is a better,more durable machine.It will outlast the Dyson.As I point out in other threads-the sad news about Dyson is it is an expensive dumpster vacuum.You maintain yours-other folks may not-so when the Dyson stops working its traded in for another-the dead trade in goes to the vac shop dumpster.They have been offered to me-but the machines are just too dirty,broken,dusty,and beat up.
 
Dys0nb0y, a taste of your own medicine...

I have a 50 year old Kirby Dual Sanitronic 50 that I restored. It looks like new and runs like new.


I would put my DS50 up against your DC65 any day and we'll see who picks up more dirt.


Will your DC65 still be working 50 years from now? Will you even be able to buy parts for it 50 years from now. I doubt it!
 
How much do kirbys cost to buy? Around £1500. Then you have bags, which in the UK are hard to get hold of an expensive. And don't keep saying "buy off ebay, used" as some people are uncomfortable buying second-hand items such as a used vacuum cleaner, understandable.

Dyson only stopped support of their dc01's and dc02's a year ago. Not bad for 19 years worth of parts all over the internet for them anyway.
 
Well said Olive oil. I owned a Kirby a few years back. They are very well built do a fantastic job on carpet I admit. But they are more suitable for large homes. I found them to big and bulky to manoeuvre around furniture etc. Also noisy heavy and a pain in the ass having to take off the floorhead to attatch the hose every time you want to use tools.The HEPA bag isn't as good as a HEPA filter. But you pays your money.....
 

Similar threads

turbo500
James Dyson: "The EU should spur invention, not mediocrity"
5 6 7
Replies
131
Views
132
sptyks
sptyks

Latest posts

Back
Top