EU Reducing Energy on Vacuums Update

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Possibly to fill up the bags with more dirt thus forcing buyers to buy more bags?

The only floor heads that have successful air bleed valves are main size turbo brushes - SEBO, Miele and some old Vax, Hoover ones have bleed valves that makes gliding a heck of a lot easier than ploughing through carpet.
 
Yep, turbo brushes usually have a true relief valve, in the form of either a slider or rotary vent. Allows you to have enough airflow going through the turbine to drive the brushes at a sufficient speed, while relieving some of the suction so the head doesn't bog down into the carpet.

On the rare occasions I use the turbo head on my Sebo D2, the vent usually needs to be left open. Running the cleaner at a high enough speed to drive the brushes usually results in the head sticking itself down onto the carpet. Slowing the motor down would prevent that, but also makes the turbo head less effective. Flicking open the vent solves the issue without affecting performance.

With regard to higher suction filling bags more quickly, I think after a certain level you reach the point of diminishing returns. There is only so much dirt that can be removed from any carpet by vacuuming. I've had Hoover cylinders with 700-800 watts that filled their bags at a rate of knots, and a 600 watt Hitachi upright that put many modern cleaners to shame. Now we have cleaners with twice or thrice the wattage, they don't fill *that* much quicker.
 
Ah but isn't there a difference between synthetic dust bags and paper dust bags? I have noticed a difference with the synthetic dust bags in my Felix than the brown paper dust bags - the synthetics tend to last longer, possibly due to their thinner but much tougher quality than paper.

I also suspect that though the process of electrostatics are clearly used, the Felix bag (and indeed the SEBO D2 bags) can actually be reused again provided you empty the bag out and suck out the clogged areas. You can't do that with paper ones.
 
Surprise Surprise... Hoover have now got the Purepower Greenray Upright back on hoover.co.uk again but with no price as of yet.
 
There are two Greenray models from the bagged Purepower with 1200 watts and the Dustmanager (based on the Freedom) Greenray upright at £179-99. Though Hoover's own link on Amazon UK shows a price of £117-99 as opposed to £174-99

The Purepower Greenray upright was last sold by Hoover from 2011, so even if it isn't listed on Hoover's own website, Amazon UK is far better to look for a search. As you will see from the link provided, it is "currently unavailable," and yet it doesn't look like anything on it has been improved since it was listed on Amazon UK and Hoover's spec page now.



http://www.amazon.co.uk/Hoover-PurePower-GreenRay-PU1240-Efficient/dp/B005MXNWE6
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Those are old models that have been on sale in the past and which HooverCandy no longer offer for sale, but which are obviously still waiting to be deleted from the website, that's why they have no price tags and you cant add them to the basket.


sebo_fan said that they were last sold in 2011.


 


It can quite easily have 290AW power for half the energy usage as it probably doesn't use the other 900W heating up the room. The 2100W Purepower wastes a lot of suction in back pressure due to the hose being too narrow to cope with it. Try removing the hose from the back of a 2100W Purepower when its switched on and feel the huge pull back on it from the bag entry socket. If the 2100W  Purepower had a bigger hose diameter I reckon it would pull over 400AW.


 


The website also inaccurately says that the Purepower greenray has 8m cable in the specs and says 7m in the text. It also lists them as having bag full indicators which they don't.
 
Sadly HI-LO, it is an example of Hoover's UK website - they are notorious for getting information wrong, showing old machines and not supplying the right data. If you go onto the site for example you won't be able to find the Slalom by physically typing the name in.

Yet if you do a Google search the following link appears - Hoover haven't updated to remove that link whether they sell the machine or not.

http://www.hoover.co.uk/small-appli...sl8123-slalom-bagless-upright-vacuum-cleaner/
 
Errors on websites

I think its indefensible that websites have so much wrong information on them regards products and their descriptions. HooverCandy should be getting the descriptions right - they are saying that the Purepower comes with a bag full light, and none of them actually do nowadays.


Even Miele have errors on their website - they show the S8 cat and dog with a power nozzle on the website, whereas they don't supply these to the UK market, and this has been like this for a good while now. They just don't seem very interested in rectifying problems on the websites.


Argos is another guilty culprit for this as well. How many times do they put the wrong image of an item on the website or put stuff in the description that is wrong - for example, the Hoover Purepower PU2115 that they have on the website still shows the wrong picture of the previous model the PU2110. What you get is a red and white machine - not an all red machine like the website shows.


I mentioned this to them in store when I collected one of these, and they said they would pass the info on to the web team. Nothing got done about it and the picture is STILL wrong.


 


What is wrong with companies nowadays? why don't they correct the errors when people point them out?
 
Actually, they did as Steve points out. See my link. I sent Miele an email a while back as I was interested in the PN model but they sent back a reply admitting that it was the wrong stock photo. As you can see from Chris' link, the model is no longer shown on site.

sebo_fan++11-21-2013-12-39-40.jpg.png
 

Latest posts

Back
Top