Electrolux Corporation Catalog of Copyrights

[electrolux137]

~
~


Good Lord.


 

 

[ronni]

I'll take that to mean that you don't know for sure.

 

[electrolux137]

~
~


You can take to mean I find it kinda funny that someone is requiring "evidence" on the date of manufacture of a 60+ year-old vacuum cleaner.

 

[ronni]

Trivializing others' queries or comments on this forum fails to encourage participation or mutual respect.

I don't understand your patronizing style or your correction of the curator of the Vacuum Cleaner Museum without proof. If you didn't care about accuracy of data of a 60-year-old cleaner then you could have just laughed it off and not responded. That would have been the kind thing to do.

Instead, you chose to be rude.

 

[electrolux137]

~
~


I'm not being rude. You're being overly sensitive, making a mountain out of a mole hill.


 

 

[bikerray]

Ronni

You seen to call a LOT of people patronizing, I suggest you start looking at your own posts first before you call anyone patronizing.

 

[electrolux137]

"Will this do?"

~
~


 

[this post was last edited: 1/24/2017-23:33]

 

[electrolux137]

Also see...

~
~


Also see this link -- scroll down to the bottom.



http://www.1377731.com/luxe/pagefive.html

 

[rainbowd4]

Model e

Actually, I thought it was pretty common knowledge that the model e came out in '54. There are even magazine ads from' 54 for the model e. Just because it was pointed out, doesn't mean it was meant to undermine anyone else's expertise, or to be rude, or disrespectful. Good grief, get a grip already.

 

[ronni]

Thank you for the information.

 

[ronni]

I apologize to those whom I've patronized with my posts, and I'm sorry for being overly sensitive and making mountains out of mole hills.