Here's your response with my replies with them IN CAPITA
Do I have to? I've been doing it for years, do you really need me to go there again? DO I HAVE TO REMIND YOU ABOUT MY COMEBACKS I HAVE BEEN DOING FOR AGES WHEN YOU WERE AGAINST DYSON?
But fine. Clearly you weren't listening the first 500,000 times I said this, so here you go. I WAS LISTENING.
Overpriced
I object to paying high prices for a cheaply made heap of creaking plastic when I can get a much sturdier built machine with a more quality motor in it for much less.
OVERPRICED? THEY WERE LIKE £200 BACK IN THE DAY, BUT SINCE THE UK MONEY VALUES HAVE INCREASED OR SOMETHING, DYSON HAVE NOT GONE MUCH EXPENSIVE. ALSO LOOK AT THE HENRY, FROM £79 TO £110.
ALSO,DYSON MOTORS ARE QUALITY. HOW MANY DC15+ MODELS HAVE YOU SEEN WITH BLOWN MOTORS? ALSO, ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY YOU CAN GET A BAGLESS MACHINE IN BETTER WUALTY THAN A DYSON? I HOPE NOT, DYSON IS THE BEST BAGLESS YOU CAN BUY. AS FOR BAGGED, THERES NOT MANY OPTIONS THAT ARE CHEAPER APART FROM A CREAKING CHINESE PUREPOWER, A HENRY (CYLNDER STRAIGHT SUCTION VAC) AND A PANASONIC BAGGED BUDGET UPRIGHT? REALLY CHRIS? THEY ALSO OFFER A 5 YEAR GUARANTEE WITH MUCH BETTER QULITY OF TOOLS AND ALL THAT THEY OFFER IN COMPARISON TO OTHER BRANDS, E.G VAX
Poorly constructed
NO, THEY ARE BUILT TO LAST. THEY ARE MADE FLEXIBLE FOR A REASON. THEY USED TO BE SOLID, BUT PLASTIC SNAPPED ETC AND THAT IS WHY THEY CHANGED TO A MUCH MORE QUALITY PLASTIC. YOU WON'T SEE MANY OF THE DYSON'S BROKEN PHYSICALLY DUE TO THIS.
Creaky plastic, plastic catches that break, tools that fall off, handles that snap. And these things are retailing at over £300? Get outa here!
Average performers
It took Dyson 21 years to finally figure out the imporance of the brushroll in an upright vacuum.
WELL THEY HAVE BEEN INNOVATING AND IMPROVING OTHER THINGS ABOUT VACUUMS. MEANWHILE, DYSON LISTENS TO THE CUSTOMERS WHICH AIN'T COLLECTORS. HOW MANY COMPLIAN ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE? NONE, COS BRITS OWN THIN PILE CARPETS, AND DON'T CARE ABOUT DEEP CLEANERS. HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THE UK WERE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BRUSHBARS? THE HELIX BRUSHBARS WERE GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE AVERAGE BRITISH PERSON IN THEIR OWN HOME
.
messy to empty and maintain
THE RELEASE BUTTON IS AT THE TOP OF THE HANDLE COMPARED TO OTHER BAGLESS VACS WITH THE RELEASE CATCH AT THE BOTTOM, RIGHT WHERE THE DIRT FALLS OUT ALSO DO IT OUTSIDE. OR IN A PLASTIC CARRIER BAG
especially when compared with a bagged cleaner. The inevitable dust cloud and the washing of the filters. Ew. Messy, dirty. I much prefer to just throw the bag in the bin and not have to handle all that dirt. But having said that, this applies to all bagless cleaners, not just Dyson. Still, it's a factor into why I think they're crap. HOW MANY BAGGED MACHINES ARE THERE ON THE MARKET TODAY? HOW MANY PEOPLE STILL USE BAGGED VACUUMS BESIDES HENRY'S IN THE UK? EVEN WHEN YOU TAKE THE BAG OUT THER'ES A POOF OF DUST, SO YOU NEED TO CLEAN OUT THE BAG COMPARTMENT, SO I WOULD RATHER EMPTY A DYSON
Overly faffy - HOW? OTHER VACUUMS REQUIRE HOSE ASSEMBLY, BUT DYSON HAS THE WAND WITH HOSE READY TO USE WITHIN A BLINK OF AN EYE
especially converting from upright to tools. Everything has a switch or a lock or a spring or something to hold everything in place. Why? We managed for years just pulling a hose cuff out of a hose and frankly, it was a lot quicker and made things much easier, especially for quick pickups.
ITS QUICKER TO RELEASE A CATCH AND HAVE THE HOSE AND WAND READY, NOT PULL THE HOSE OUT BY BENDING DOWN TO GRAB IT, THE PULL THE TUBES OUT, FIT THEM ONTO THE HOSE AND THEN USE IT, WHEREAS THE MESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GONE BY THEN IF IT WERE A DYSON UPRIGHT
Cleaning span is too limited
LONG HOSE, REASONABLY SIZED HEAD, LOTS OF TOOLS AND ON BOARD, BALL MACHINES, A WAND AND A LONG CABLE
Two words - low furniture.
WHAT ABOUT OTHER BAGLESS UPRIGHTS? EXCEPT THE VAX MACH AIR, BUT EVEN THE DYSON BALL CAN HAVE THE HEAD FIT UNDER LOW FURNITURE, AND THERES THE DIGITAL SLIM, AND PEOPLE STILL USE THE DC03 TODAY. THATS THE QUALITY
Fraudulant claims by the company
LIKE WHAT? NO LOSS OF SUCTION IS TRUE.
First cyclonic vacuum? First filterless vacuum? No loss of suction?
I know that these are rubbish. It doesn't encourage me to want to invest my hard earned money on a product from a company who make such false claims.
WELL EXPLAIN WHY PEOPLE ARE MUCH HAPPIER WITH THEIR NEW SHINY DYSON OR THEIR OLD DUSTY DYSON COMPARED TO THEIR OLD VACUUMS? MOST RECOMMEND THEIR DYSON OVER ANOTHER BRAND. THEY JUST WORK BETTER. AND NOT LIKE COLLECTORS, PEOPLE DONT CARE. OVERALL DYSON MAKE GREAT MACHINES.
#######**** I thought you liked the DC40 btw? you said the performance was much better....#######**********
Do I have to? I've been doing it for years, do you really need me to go there again? DO I HAVE TO REMIND YOU ABOUT MY COMEBACKS I HAVE BEEN DOING FOR AGES WHEN YOU WERE AGAINST DYSON?
But fine. Clearly you weren't listening the first 500,000 times I said this, so here you go. I WAS LISTENING.
Overpriced
I object to paying high prices for a cheaply made heap of creaking plastic when I can get a much sturdier built machine with a more quality motor in it for much less.
OVERPRICED? THEY WERE LIKE £200 BACK IN THE DAY, BUT SINCE THE UK MONEY VALUES HAVE INCREASED OR SOMETHING, DYSON HAVE NOT GONE MUCH EXPENSIVE. ALSO LOOK AT THE HENRY, FROM £79 TO £110.
ALSO,DYSON MOTORS ARE QUALITY. HOW MANY DC15+ MODELS HAVE YOU SEEN WITH BLOWN MOTORS? ALSO, ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY YOU CAN GET A BAGLESS MACHINE IN BETTER WUALTY THAN A DYSON? I HOPE NOT, DYSON IS THE BEST BAGLESS YOU CAN BUY. AS FOR BAGGED, THERES NOT MANY OPTIONS THAT ARE CHEAPER APART FROM A CREAKING CHINESE PUREPOWER, A HENRY (CYLNDER STRAIGHT SUCTION VAC) AND A PANASONIC BAGGED BUDGET UPRIGHT? REALLY CHRIS? THEY ALSO OFFER A 5 YEAR GUARANTEE WITH MUCH BETTER QULITY OF TOOLS AND ALL THAT THEY OFFER IN COMPARISON TO OTHER BRANDS, E.G VAX
Poorly constructed
NO, THEY ARE BUILT TO LAST. THEY ARE MADE FLEXIBLE FOR A REASON. THEY USED TO BE SOLID, BUT PLASTIC SNAPPED ETC AND THAT IS WHY THEY CHANGED TO A MUCH MORE QUALITY PLASTIC. YOU WON'T SEE MANY OF THE DYSON'S BROKEN PHYSICALLY DUE TO THIS.
Creaky plastic, plastic catches that break, tools that fall off, handles that snap. And these things are retailing at over £300? Get outa here!
Average performers
It took Dyson 21 years to finally figure out the imporance of the brushroll in an upright vacuum.
WELL THEY HAVE BEEN INNOVATING AND IMPROVING OTHER THINGS ABOUT VACUUMS. MEANWHILE, DYSON LISTENS TO THE CUSTOMERS WHICH AIN'T COLLECTORS. HOW MANY COMPLIAN ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE? NONE, COS BRITS OWN THIN PILE CARPETS, AND DON'T CARE ABOUT DEEP CLEANERS. HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THE UK WERE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BRUSHBARS? THE HELIX BRUSHBARS WERE GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE AVERAGE BRITISH PERSON IN THEIR OWN HOME
.
messy to empty and maintain
THE RELEASE BUTTON IS AT THE TOP OF THE HANDLE COMPARED TO OTHER BAGLESS VACS WITH THE RELEASE CATCH AT THE BOTTOM, RIGHT WHERE THE DIRT FALLS OUT ALSO DO IT OUTSIDE. OR IN A PLASTIC CARRIER BAG
especially when compared with a bagged cleaner. The inevitable dust cloud and the washing of the filters. Ew. Messy, dirty. I much prefer to just throw the bag in the bin and not have to handle all that dirt. But having said that, this applies to all bagless cleaners, not just Dyson. Still, it's a factor into why I think they're crap. HOW MANY BAGGED MACHINES ARE THERE ON THE MARKET TODAY? HOW MANY PEOPLE STILL USE BAGGED VACUUMS BESIDES HENRY'S IN THE UK? EVEN WHEN YOU TAKE THE BAG OUT THER'ES A POOF OF DUST, SO YOU NEED TO CLEAN OUT THE BAG COMPARTMENT, SO I WOULD RATHER EMPTY A DYSON
Overly faffy - HOW? OTHER VACUUMS REQUIRE HOSE ASSEMBLY, BUT DYSON HAS THE WAND WITH HOSE READY TO USE WITHIN A BLINK OF AN EYE
especially converting from upright to tools. Everything has a switch or a lock or a spring or something to hold everything in place. Why? We managed for years just pulling a hose cuff out of a hose and frankly, it was a lot quicker and made things much easier, especially for quick pickups.
ITS QUICKER TO RELEASE A CATCH AND HAVE THE HOSE AND WAND READY, NOT PULL THE HOSE OUT BY BENDING DOWN TO GRAB IT, THE PULL THE TUBES OUT, FIT THEM ONTO THE HOSE AND THEN USE IT, WHEREAS THE MESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GONE BY THEN IF IT WERE A DYSON UPRIGHT
Cleaning span is too limited
LONG HOSE, REASONABLY SIZED HEAD, LOTS OF TOOLS AND ON BOARD, BALL MACHINES, A WAND AND A LONG CABLE
Two words - low furniture.
WHAT ABOUT OTHER BAGLESS UPRIGHTS? EXCEPT THE VAX MACH AIR, BUT EVEN THE DYSON BALL CAN HAVE THE HEAD FIT UNDER LOW FURNITURE, AND THERES THE DIGITAL SLIM, AND PEOPLE STILL USE THE DC03 TODAY. THATS THE QUALITY
Fraudulant claims by the company
LIKE WHAT? NO LOSS OF SUCTION IS TRUE.
First cyclonic vacuum? First filterless vacuum? No loss of suction?
I know that these are rubbish. It doesn't encourage me to want to invest my hard earned money on a product from a company who make such false claims.
WELL EXPLAIN WHY PEOPLE ARE MUCH HAPPIER WITH THEIR NEW SHINY DYSON OR THEIR OLD DUSTY DYSON COMPARED TO THEIR OLD VACUUMS? MOST RECOMMEND THEIR DYSON OVER ANOTHER BRAND. THEY JUST WORK BETTER. AND NOT LIKE COLLECTORS, PEOPLE DONT CARE. OVERALL DYSON MAKE GREAT MACHINES.
#######**** I thought you liked the DC40 btw? you said the performance was much better....#######**********
)))
