Dyson DC01 De Stijl X2

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

videos and vacuums

so chris, i cant say if the sebo x4's are good even though i have watched many reviews with people saying how good they are, and how they like the performance, and when alex did that video of the x4 test you, cant judge the performance of the machine thereofre you cant say alex's sebo did good
 
^You can't entirely form a fully valid and informed opinion of any cleaner until you have actually use it in person. I've been caught out before with that and learnt the hard way not to judge a cleaner until I've used it. 


 


And hey, Dyson get hundreds of good reviews, doesn't mean I like em....
 
Talking of reviews, you know the PurePower has many good reviews on the Argos website ? Yet we know better and it astonishes me that people can actually praise the PP with all the faults we know about being collectors and enthusiasts.
 
Bottom line is though, Jamie, that the Purepower has pretty reasonable pick up. If you ignore the fact that we are enthusiasts of vacuums and put yourself in the general consumers shoes for a moment, the Purepower isn't as bad as we make it out to be. It's only because we notice the design flaws and also compare with other vacuums. To your average vacuum buying public, the Purepower picks the mess up off the carpet. Job done. 
 
You have a point there.

The Dust Manager on the other hand, even the general consumer wouldn't be able to ignore the flaws in that!
 
Buyers and Collectors - Two very different groups of peeps.

RE: Argos reviews.

Argos reviews are very much written by the common buyer and I tend to look at them if I'm buying a product from Argos before passing off my money. In terms of the PP vacs though Jamie, a lot of buyers just buy the machine because it has the "Hoover" name attached to it. Yet with other models, some buyers have put comments on that slate the particular model, citing that Hoover weren't the brand they thought they were buying, leading from their past glory.

Another review company, Reevoo seems to be used by Hoover UK on their own website but they never seem to check up on the actual content of the reviews, only using the average rating to promote the models - yet some of the Reevoo reviews are really quite damaging to some of the machines that Hoover have not done their homework in checking up with.

It does surprise me that Hoover don't learn from their reputation. Clearly although the Pure Power has its many faults, its bag design is far more efficient even if buyers do have to source bags. Buyers tend to live the mantra that if you buy a cheap bag less upright vacuum, it means no more buying bags - but then they find they have to either buy a replacement filter or a drive belt. End of the day they have to keep buying something for it. As Chris states quite clearly, buyers aren't that bothered in flaws - they buy a machine that is fit for purpose.

I have however said this before and will continue to do again - when I had to live with a Dustmanager in a rented property, a friend from the Yahoo Hooverland group advised me to get a bag holder grommet from either an old Pure Power or from a repair shop, thus chucking away the hopeless split bag less bin design and screwing in the bag holder to the back of the machine that just uses the Pure Power body. Result? A high suction powered upright vacuum able to use the dust bags AND maintaining better power, suction and ultimately the performance the design illustrates. The cost of the part was next to nothing either!

Albeit being noisy and a brute to push - an inherent design fault I hate about Pure Powers despite their height selection.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top