Dyson cinetic big ball

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

I remember reading years ago, that the Dyson Digital Motor was supposedly able to operate with no exhaust filter, 'cos there were no carbon dust emissions. That is believable, because it is a brushless motor.

If the Cinetic cyclone technology is so good that a pre-motor filter is not required, why on Earth did Dyson not fit a Digital Motor?

Had they done so, there would be no pre-filter and no need for an exhaust filter, making the machine almost filter-less (that mesh screen in the bin is still a filter).

Maybe they need the exhaust filter to reduce noise levels...
 
Thanks for the video Dyson boy I like the new flexible crevice tool that is also an under appliance tool. I want one of those to clean under my washing machine and fridge.
 
Does any know what wattage the UK version of this Dyson is? Only asking as the QVC US clip the lady mentions a bigger ball for a bigger motor with increased power. I wouldn't of thought that be the case for the UK/Europe version.
 
I

<span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino;">looked in my mums new "Kays" catalogue that arrived today. I noticed that the "Cinetic Big Ball Animal" was more expensive in the catalogue as you would expect.</span>


<span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino;">I was surprised when I saw it's been rated C on carpets. </span>


 


<span style="font-family: book antiqua,palatino;">James
smiley-smile.gif
</span>

kirbymodel2c-2015011616132603908_1.jpg
 
i tend not to listen to the ratings anymore because of what people say as not done properly.i'm sure the ratings are wrong as a miele gets c for carpet as well and that's one of the best fot  carpes you can get.so probably this new dyson cleans the same even better than miele.


 
 
There must be something very wrong...

...with those performance ratings.

I honestly don't think that Dyson, Miele et al are poor performers. It's more likely the ratings are skewed depending on who is testing them. Hence the perfectly reasonable calls for independent test centres to do the testing. In-house testing is plainly wrong.
 
The ratings are all over the place. For example, a cheap, bagless Vax with no brushroll off function was awarded an A rating on hardfloors whereas a straight suction Henry was awarded a C rating. We all know that the Henry would be better on hard floors out of the two.
 
He who vacuums last wins,

<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px; font-weight: normal;">He who vacuums last wins</span>


 
No one has said dyson is better than kirby.so i don't see the point you posting that video .and that video is flawed every vacuum is going to leave dust in the carpet no vacuum can get it all out.so this video is rubbish?
 
i honestly don't see the point posting that video. this has nothing to do with kirby. The test is flawed all vacuum can't remove all the dust.the vacuum those goes last always wins.
 
It probably works about as well as any other Dyson. If anyone knows does it have better suction than the DC07?

I'm not opposed to Dyson, I think they are marketing upper level discount store quality.

A few things that I don't agree with, Fantom's original 9 and 11 amp models originally shipped with no pre or post motor filter, we've been there done that (and I am willing to bet a Thunder still outcleans this one, meaning Dyson hasn't been able to design a machine to outclean the original machines based on their technology).

Rainbow had filterless vacs for longer than James Dyson has been alive. I very highly doubt it will outclean a Rainbow because of brush roller agitation.
 
DC07 and DC08 have th most powerful suction out of any Dyson. Then it is the DC14/39/54 models with 290 AW. DC07 and 08 models had 330AW
 
This is so amusing.


 


Somebody makes a video pitting a Dyson against an inferior machine and certain people start clucking like mad hens; "look at how much better it is!", "look at how much it picks up!"




Somebody makes a video pitting Dyson against a superior machine and suddenly it's a flawed test?  


 


 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top