Disappointed with Dyson ethics

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

It would be the EU as a whole. But don't forget it will be the manufacturers who pays for the tests. And if it leads to more efficient machines it will save on our energy bills not to mention the environment.
 
The idea behind the legislation was to lower the wattage and keep performance high, thus improving the reliability of the machine with less being thrown away and less money being spent in the long term to dispose of old cleaners. In theory, it's a great plan, but it's been executed extremely poorly.
 
And they wouldn't need lots of test facilities there aren't huge amounts of new models coming out each year.
 
Well there are plenty of vacuums coming out from brands every year, and less so given that every couple of months Vax from TTI keep churning out something new.

But then the brands have sat up and read some of the rules that the EU law dictates, not just lowering motor watts.

I shouldn't wonder that we'll also be seeing far more wet and dry vacuums appearing soon - after all, when considering the exemption list of products, there's a bit more to chew on in terms of how brands can get around the new law with the exemption rules in place.

The implications of the exemption could provide brands in the UK to at last develop:

1) Cheaper central vacuums for UK homes.
2) More robotic vacuums with a wet/dry suction facility.
3) Combo floor polishers with vacuum cleaner suction provision (SEBO Felix Disco springs to mind, here).
4) More cordless permutations.

sebo_fan-2015012121181606192_1.png
 
One final point I wish to make Marcus, and though no fault of your own, is a thought that has often been expressed by so many other members on here; no vacuum cleaner is perfect, and neither are the brand. Some come close on truths but largely at the end of the day, most are out to make money and can often be liberal with the actual truth.

With regard to testing new carpet pieces, I'm not entirely sure how that would work. Spira makes a very good point that top soil carpet would have to be removed first if new samples of existing carpet was to be used, but I would still expect infrequencies of data in terms of pick up. Lets not forget that though some brands are using different quality bristles in the brush rolls, only a few brands are also making changes to the actual sole plate and general design to allow more force of suction to occur.

Whilst I have said it all along that the EU energy labels have not been properly thought out, I don't think it is all that important to know if a vacuum cleaner should have a rating for pick on dust from carpets and hard floors. After all, how can one rate a vacuum cleaner usage on just floor use alone? If we are going to get pedantic, then surely there should be a test that conducts sealed suction instead as well as durability? These aspects would be a heck of a lot better for customers as well as, to some degree, contribute a much better rating to support eco concerns and long term maintenance.
 
Yes it can become a complicated business. It should just be used as a rough guide. I would rather rely on my own experience of a brand and a high percentage of positive reviews of a product and listen to peoples opinions on here. That's good enough for me. :-)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top