centralsweeper63
Well-known member
I agree with him on central vsacsthough.
Yeah he does. He pulls out that particle meter and the way he uses it is complete bs. This is one of the things about his videos that grinds my gears. I still remember him taking a totally beat up Kenmore that had not been serviced, had old blown out filters and was missing the lid over the Pet Powermate cubby. Even had a full bag. He put a particle meter on it and no surprise it blew a big number. He then used that to "prove" Kenmores had crappy filtration. How about testing a new Kenmore or one that has been cleaned and refurbished with fresh filters and clean HEPA dust bag? Then there was the Aerus Classic he had apart. He removed the exhaust filter and ran a finger down inside the motor housing. He found carbon dust and used that to claim Aerus had lousy filtration. Never mind everything outside of the filter was squeaky clean. PR is as biased as V-F, but in a different way.This I agree with, I also would add PR doesn't try to fool or impress people with "scientific theories."
In regards to Dyson machines, IMO that is where he balances out VF, as he flies to the other extreme on the biased propaganda scale. While I experience some of the same issues with Dyson's as he does, I don't find the need to change filters etc nearly as much as he claims.