Cleaning company using Rainbows - what dyson owner missed?

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

ralph123

Well-known member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
568
Location
Memphis tn
I found it interesting that a cleaning company would (1) use Rainbow vacuums, and (2) would attribute dirt collected to the vacuum, and (3) show pictures of filth from customer's homes.

Caption to picture:
"This is what the Rainbow picked up from one room while the homeowner normally uses a Dyson. 😷 bag-less & bag vacuums will not and cannot remove the deep down dirt from hardwood, concrete & carpet."

Did the Dyson really miss all of that dirt? Or perhaps did the homeowner "miss" the dirt, by not vacuuming properly? Or by not maintaining their Dyson properly? Or did the homeowner figure that they were paying the cleaning company to vacuum, so they just didn't bother? I guess the cleaning company doesn't consider the Rainbow to be bag-less?



http://https//www.facebook.com/rain....1443470552./1615817935315355/?type=3&theater
ralph123-2015092815040706518_1.jpg
 
Ralph I cannot make you link work for me.

I think you are correct in all that you have said. The dirt does not mean the homeowners vacuum cleaner is no good, for all the reasons you mention.

The question is, if this is dirt that was found in flooring, what are the real-life health issues with it?
 
I saw a second message on their facebook page with the same picture: "Why pick Rainbow Brite Clean Team? We deep clean each room 15 minutes using the Rainbow. What's the difference? All dry filter vacuums (bag-less & with bags) reduce cleaning ability by 80% when the vacuum is bran new after the 1st ten minutes. The Rainbow stays at 100% Cleaning Ability. This is what the Rainbow picked up from one room while the homeowner normally uses a Dyson."


this comment is especially curious because the Dyson maintains it's suction. I have no idea which Dyson they are comparing to, but their claim that the cleaning ability of the Dyson drops by 80% is dubious.
 
Actually

Not defending the practice, but hardwood floors do have dirt that gets between the slats, and concrete floors are very porous which can allow dust to settle where a broom would just sweep over it and not shift it. However, any vacuum could lift dirt from these surfaces just as effectively IMO.
 
I have a Rainbow and LOVE IT

It is an awesome machine! However, I'm a clean freak and the first 2 years I vacuumed daily with a well maintained Kenmore Can in my brand new house with berber. When I got my Rainbow in 2006, yes the water was dirty, but not horribly dirty....so the Kenmore canister was doing it's job. I just like using my rainbow to dust the house because it has the 14 foot hose and small wand and dusting brush that I can get high and low. With any other vacuum, that quick release handle is too bulky when dusting with the dusting brush trying to get into tight spaces. I sometimes use the rainbow PN, but not always. I find more and more I'm using the rainbow to dust my entire house floor to ceiling.
 
Honestly I have made the water in the rainbow look like that just vacuuming the halls in the building I live in. (weekly) Also at a farm house that the renters didn't do much vacuuming or the vacuum wasn't working like it should. At the house the water completely stopped moving. A second through vacuuming and the water was still thick but moving. There was a lot of animal hair the first round of vacuuming.
 
That makes sense now

They charge to do some cleaning and then hope to sell a vacuum cleaner. Not a bad idea at all. But they are not a cleaning business in the sense of the sort of company I might want to hire to clean my flat throughly - walls, furniture, light fittings etc.
 
The way they see it: If they're driving out to your house, hoping you're actually there and didn't forget, they want more than $25 of work to do.

House cleaners are shockingly expensive. Even when they're not very good.
 
House cleaners and unrealistic homeowner expectations

My partner's mother cleans homes for a living.  She charges over $120 for an 8-hour day, and she works alone.  Honestly, that's a bargain.  Once people KNOW someone is cleaning for them, they tend to become very lazy, sloppy, and entitled about their personal upkeep of their home.  "I'm NOT going to pick up that trash/food/mess!  What are we paying Maria for?!"  Then the homeowners expect the home to look cleaner/better than it did after the previous visit, despite the additional trash/grime they have been putting in place.


 


Whoever thinks $25 is sufficient for an entire crew, AND would expect their toilet and oven to be cleaned (two different rooms' amenities) has a similar outlook.  I'm damn glad that I and my loved ones don't clean that home.
 
$25.00 would be a bargain if it didn't cost upwards of $2000.00 to buy the vacuum. They are preying on the fears of germophobes that are terrified of dust mites.

Sounds like they have the same type of game as Kirby. Win a free room of carpet shampooing. Next thing you know you are buying a $2000.00 vacuum cleaner. Not that I have paid that much for a Kirby. They come way down on the price or carry it back out the door with them.
 
Most Rainbow distributors operate the same way and don't do this. This sounds like a clever trick by someone down the chain or some smaller distributor that worked up the chain and is doing it independently. Clever though, clean a few rooms disgust the person and sell the vac or if not still made a good buck. In a larger population area you could probably make a good deal of money.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top