Bye Bye Royal metal vacuums

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

Sadly, it doesn't seem like Royal was trying very hard. It may be a good vac, but it's based on a design that's almost 100 years old. Consumers don't want to buy old stuff. And if they do, they'll buy actually old stuff. It's that simple. I suppose it is still a little surprising as I would have thought they still marketed/sold them for janitorial work. If they did, they should have plenty of business... but idk.

If you ask me, they were trying to milk the metal uprights for as much profit in sales and as little investment in development as possible, until they couldn't sell any more of them.
 
I’ll second that. New Royals look old coming out of the box. They are great vacuums, but non-enthusiasts are likely to think they are antiquated. In a way, they are.

When I was wheeling my cart carrying my 1998 1020Z to the counter at the Goodwill recycling center, an employee in probably his early twenties, like me, came up and excitedly remarked “Hey! You got a real old one. They don’t make those any more. Right on!”

To someone who probably doesn’t know anything about vacuums, the Royal seemed like a relic.
 
"Old","Antiquated" This is where the Royal dealer needs to DEMENSTRATE to the prospect why the "old school" design is BETTER.Remember a YouTube video that demonstrates this VERY well.Its again the DEALER needs to do his job in promoting and demo'ing these machines to customers.If the customer SEES the Royal doing a better job than the WalMart or whatever plastivac-MAYBE-just MAYBE the customer will buy the Royal machine.DEALERS---DO YOUR JOBS!!!!!!Than MAYBE the metal Royal uprights could get a reprieve-And yes--despite their old school looks and such Kirby is still going to survive-think the DTD is whats helping them survive.Customers can SEE the Kirby picking up stuff rather than just seeing the machine sitting on a shelf at a box store and can't try it.Remember a vacuum cleaner is a tool YOU have to try it like other tools.Like the tool displays at Lowes-you can see the machines---but can't TRY them!
 
No wonder

I cannot even search for a dealer on their website because of some error or billing issue. If they want to up sales then they should at least start taking care if the basics
 
Glad I bought mine

I got my lightly used on eBay. It is sad but I think it's just because of their styling. We all like modernized products, even decor. It's a niche market for those of us who would care about how well something performs. Most people don't shop at vacuum stores anymore, not mention would the seriously consider touching a royal in a store. I DO understand why they are on their way out the door because everything about them is "classic". Plus if someone did find them to be a neat gadget, they would probably be put off by the belt changes and noise. However I do love mine, glad I got one. The noise is t really bad for me because my house is smaller. It grooms well but the wheels ruin my beautiful carpet lines.
 
Ben

Stark museum I called asked on royal inventory and he said the only inventory was new inventory. The old manuals were thrown out and no records kept. This was in January.
Les
 
Sad...

I didn't know a whole lot about Royal and had never used one before either. Well, back in January I bought one -- a 1988 884 -- from a thrift store. I almost walked away from it as I had already found a Kirby Sentria a couple of weeks before, plus there was a Kirby Heritage II Legend sitting right next to it that I put into my cart. I didn't want to go down the rabbit hole of collecting a whole bunch of stuff, so I passed on it -- almost. I was taking the Heritage II up to the front to pay for it when I stopped right back around and came back for the Royal. I'm glad that I did.

I'm glad I bought mine. It's a great little machine and seems like it is just as reliable and sturdy as Kirby. It's very quiet, it's simple in design and it does a really good job.

I shudder to think about what plans Bissell has for the Sanitaire brand, since their main machines are based off of something from the 50's (40's?). I mean, commercial users don't care about flash and pizzazz like consumers do, but maybe Bissell will assume that commercial users want a rebadged PowerForce bagless. The cost of production for the Sanitaire F&G must be very low as the tooling had paid for itself a hundredfold, but maybe the material and component cost -- the steel handles and brushrolls, the cloth bag and a motor that's not the usual Ametek-style tank/bypass style -- may encourage them to just rebadge one of their consumer uprights.

It's scary to think about what may come of Kirby once Mr. Buffett passes and somebody else takes the reins of Berkshire Hathaway. Will they well off Kirby/Scott Fetzer? Will they decide to move production to China? Will they make radical decisions to get rid of the iconic cast aluminum design and plasticize the entire machine? I am looking forward to see what comes after the long run of G-series machines but am kind of concerned as well. I think that it would be wise for Kirby to look in to dealer networks, kind of like Electrolux, Miele and so on, while keeping their D2D sales network and putting more effort into cracking down on and wedding out dishonest distributors and growing and investing in productive and honest distributors. They could possibly look into having their machines sold at upscale/high end department stores with in-store demos, and if it works, maybe expand into midrange stores like Macy and Sears (if Sears is able to climb out of their problems).
 
Honestly I think what the other said about plastic machines that are throw away is part of it.

Even most commercial places I see these days, are not using the commercial vacuums. They are using bagless Bissells and other machines that are not even the commercial version of the household units. No commercial Hoovers, no Royals, no Windsors, no Sanitaires. I knew a hotel that had great Sanitaires. A few years later I see they are vacuuming with crappy BOL Bissell Powerforce bagless uprights. It's the norm these days.

I also think with the younger generations, they don't give a crap about vacuums. If they are they just want tech and flash factor, and that's what the Roombas, Dyson stick vacs, etc give them. They're not interested in performance, they don't want or need a Kirby, a full size upright, a canister or any of that. They don't have interest in deep cleaning. And a lot of young people are poor and live in small apartments so there's no need for a full size vacuum anyway.

Maybe as they start to have more income and possibly move into larger places, a full size, and maybe higher end, better quality vacuum will be what they're looking for. IDK. But I think it'll be a while before they're looking for a Kirby or anything besides what you can get at the local Walmart or Bed Bath and Beyond.
 
I'm 26...

and I tend to like things that may look outdated, but are proven and time-tested rather than things that are flashy and tech-laden. My wife is the opposite but that's OK.

One exception is that my wife and I both wanted to replace the ca. 2004 kitchen original to our house (white Frigidaire appliances) with stainless. I was hard-set on Whirlpool (or KitchenAid if I could get a good deal on them), she was drawn to the LG and Samsung packages, despite my warnings. I figured that the Whirlpool appliances would last longer and be easier to fix and get parts for, plus they were made in America, something that's important to me. The best thing was that the Whirlpool package that we bought was cheaper than the comparative LG or Samsung packages. No problems with any of the appliances so far. Not sure what would have happened if we bought Samsung or LG.

In 2015, I did slip up and bought a made-in-China Kenmore (LG) front load machine, on impulse and replaced my perfectly fine ca. 2004 Kenmore 90 Series (Whirlpool direct drive) washer (which, rest assured, I donated to ReStore). I only did it because Sears had quite the deal going for their rewards members. It was normally $800 at its lowest, but I walked out with that (and a BOL Kenmore dryer) for $550 total including tax. I really wanted a Speed Queen front load machine but that was a little steep at $2k. It's been four years since we've had this washer and we've had no problems at all, but if/when it gets replaced, I will buy a Speed Queen FL (I was thinking about buying a Whirlpool FL but the guys over at AW.org actually say that LG builds a better front loader. Imagine that...).

Other than that, I use an ancient (in phone years) Samsung Galaxy phone (and it's not even the higher end ones) but it serves my purposes well. My laptop is an off-lease ThinkPad that I bought off eBay, which was cheaper to buy than even some of the cheap, disposable new consumer grade laptops sold in the stores. Our TV in the living room is just a plain 42-incher 1080p from Walmart, it's only "smart" because that's all they sell now, but we've never connected it to the Internet. Instead, I built a HTPC for it since it offers more flexibility and doesn't have any of the spyware that smart TVs are known for. Our kitchen appliances are nice but nothing special, just a basic Oster blender, a basic KitchenAid stand mixer, a no-frills Kenmore toaster and a cheap but reliable Mr. Coffee coffeemaker (for me. My wife has Starbucks every morning), and other like items.

Oh, and vacuums, the subject matter at hand! After we started out with a Bissell PowerForce, I bought a Sanitaire SC886, even though my wife wanted a Dyson rather than that "old thing" (even though it was BRAND NEW in the box). A few years passed with just the Sanitaire and then the rest was history since January of this year when I randomly walked into a Goodwill and came out with a Sentria, with all attachments, for virtually nothing. In addition to that, I ordered my wife a Dyson Animal 2 that I gifted to her for her birthday, plus I have a Royal 884, a Hoover Convertible, a Kirby Avalir, Heritage II Legend (and soon, a Dual Sanitronic 50, which I will have on display in our foyer) in addition to my Rug Doctor X3. My wife loves the look of her Dyson but contends that MY vacuums seem (and sound) more powerful. However, since she was nice enough to let me have this "odd" hobby of buying thrift-store vacs and refurbishing them, I bought her what she wanted.
 
Well built vacuums like the Royal and or Kirby are a thing of the past in the commercial market. With all the clean air standards manufacturers have their focus on hepa filtration. Sound levels and on board tools are a big thing as well as back pac vacuums. In addition manufactures don't want commercial company's to purchase equipment that can be kept long term with minimal repair needs or replacement.

In the commercial market a vacuum is designed to last 1 to 5 years. Well taken care of many of the vacuums can out live that usable life expectancy. This is a disposable world we are now living in. Nothing will last forever any more.
 
Bulkier

If you bulked up the royal and use about 1/2inch to 1 inch think sound dampeners and a amodel fan the royal would be quiet and out perform anything on the market currently. The sanitairre line is good but a royal with adaptations would be slightly better. Sanitairre is pretty close to commercial gold standard. Saying there a thing of the past is true but small change it would outperform any commercial vacuum. The bag unit they could use a bag setup like sanitairre quick clean. I'd maybe give metal brush roll too and have bristle inserts like vibrate groom brushes.
I know it won't happen but noise dampeners amodel fan metal brush roll quick clean bag system it would be the gold standard.
It's being bastardized like an oreck and a hoover the changes I mentioned would keep it quality and not a freaking oreck or Hoover. There is nothing against Hoover but current lineup is pure turds.
Les
 

Latest posts

Back
Top