Search results

Every manufacturer who changes their connectors receives criticism.

@vac14012 thanks for the reviews, and prepare for the upcoming fireworks!

‘Notarized’ proof of lie detector results.

I've done this (not many holidays though) for a long time. When I was younger and single (no family) it didn't bother me much. I am conflicted wanting to travel and also being home. Perhaps I was Odysseus in a former life :ROFLMAO:

Not convincing. statistically significant, where is your evidence, not real-world, operated by charletons, etc etc :ROFLMAO:

I have the honor(?) of working this weekend, away from home. It is part of the career I chose, so only some mild complaints!

Why do you think (claim) VF is a champion scientific facts? Just because he posts charts* and data, doesn't make his opinions facts or his tests scientific. I hope you can see that he has a double standard, that he practices the exact same thing he condemns others for doing. *while a lot of...

"truth"

Don't forget we're all a bunch of ignorant whining trolls.

Where 'petty criticism' Show us this statistically significant data on real-world usage.

Pity you didn't evidence in an objective and convincing manner how the V15 was being used incorrectly. Instead, you simply insulted and decreed by fiat.

Aha, so you misspoke (mistyped) when you used that pesky little word "you're?" And you wouldn't call someone else demonstrating the same issue (clamping) all those insults? Am I getting this right, oh master?

Interesting take, or now are 'you' redefining the word "you?" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/you Is this enough, or do I need to provide to prove the definition of the word 'you?' Seeing how 'you' are replying to 'me' in the below post, regarding 'me' posting someone else's...

I would love to find one of your "factual claims" that fit the bill, but you ask an impossible task because none such exists. Show me ONE case that you've done a notated, statistically significant sample size test, and all the other stuff you demand from others, that justifies your claims. Just...

Essentially all of what you claim. Your tests/results/conclusions (ahem, "facts") are not generated from scientific study, but any thought, opinion, test result, comment, observation that disagrees with you must absolutely be rock solid scientifically vetted. See the double standard there?

Have any pictures of the Classic III handy? Parents had one of those when I was a kid.

Let’s apply your standards to your tests then shall we? Because when we do, they are nothing more than

So if I were to take a video of my V15 clamping to the carpet while in max mode, which shows the exact same issue as I noted, post it here, all those insults would not apply to me? Dance all you like around it but the “facts” are clear and present. At best you’re attempting to place a...

Here is another example. Do you honestly not believe you are not directly insulting @centralsweeper63 in this post? Specifically in the first two sentences?

Yes they did, you were responding to specific answers “I” provided about “my” issues with “my” use of a V15, on the behalf of “your” specific question regarding “my” specific issues. Play by play: 1. You asked for the specific issues I had. 2. I provided videos that shows the EXACT issues I...