General Carpet Cleaning

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

What method do you prefer? (Not for a spill or anything that would require extraction)

  • Extraction

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Dry Power (Sebo Duo)

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Shampoo (Kirby)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4

SeboU1

Well-known member
Gold Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
82
Location
Pittsburgh PA
What method do you prefer for general maintenance cleaning? I previously preferred the Kirby shampoo, but it can be time consuming for large rooms. My preferred method is the Sebo duo powder, it seems to remove anything I want removed. I also appreciate that Sebo claims that the Duo powder eliminates dust mites for 6 months, as I am severely allergic. I really hate using an extractor, also why I would not like a Rainbow.
 
I think dry powder would be good for some cases, others need extraction. If it is used every 3 or 6 months to keep dirt off and keep it fresh that is where dry powder is good. The extraction method in my opinion is good for old or heavily stained carpets. E.G. getting a few more years out of a 20 year old carpet that hasn't been cleaned beyond vacuuming before.
 
I think dry powder would be good for some cases, others need extraction. If it is used every 3 or 6 months to keep dirt off and keep it fresh that is where dry powder is good. The extraction method in my opinion is good for old or heavily stained carpets. E.G. getting a few more years out of a 20 year old carpet that hasn't been cleaned beyond vacuuming before.
I agree. The people that usually have never cleaned their carpets believe that “cleaning carpets makes them attract dirt.”
 
To me the answer is self evident; it is extraction. If the dry powder method was superior, that is what you’d see the professionals use. (The professionals that drive around in vans with specialized equipment)
 
To me the answer is self evident; it is extraction. If the dry powder method was superior, that is what you’d see the professionals use. (The professionals that drive around in vans with specialized equipment)
I do prefer the truck mounted extraction, their machine removes much more liquid than a portable unit such as a Rug Doctor.
 
Each to their own. Plenty of evidence of professionals using a wide range of techniques out there, including microsponges (which are not dry powder, incidentally). It's very easy to demonstrate the superiority of microsponges over other techniques for real-world domestic usage.

I agree. The people that usually have never cleaned their carpets believe that “cleaning carpets makes them attract dirt.”
Resoiling is a known phenomenon with multiple causes. These include wick back to sticky chemical residue that results in faster resoiling. So, there is some truth to their claim, although that's not an excuse to correctly clean a carpet in need.

For service-providing or commercial usage, microsponges with appropriate equipment for larger scale delivery is superior, according to data available in the literature. Some extreme soiling may benefit from pre-clean with steam extraction, prior to microsponge final cleaning for best results (microbiologically and resoiling). In general, water should be avoided on fitted carpets for many reasons covered in the links above, but carpets that are extremely abused and neglected will not particularly suffer if it's used initially, or if a wet stain has already occurred.

Many will disagree with this but I guarantee they will present absolutely no convincing objective evidence to support their position, distinct from that provided above and further correctly conducted fact-checks. That's how you know you can safely discard such subjective sources.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top