Laughable, eh? This is a tired piece of embarrasingly pathetic illogicality, and it's hypocritical. Figures. I've used cumbersome, heavy, awkward, plug-in mains cleaners and would never go back (including Dyson machines). I've used bagged cleaners and I'd never go back. I've used cleaners with running costs and I'd never go back. I've used cleaners which tangle hair around a single straight floor roller and I'd never go back (including the Gen5). I've used cleaners which don't auto adjust to all floor types without head changes and I'd never go back. And so on and so on. Regardless of what the product is, the problems stem from the fundamental technologies being used. I'm aware of this because, unlike you, hypocritically, I've used the latest technologies and experienced them. I've also understood their evolution at a deeper technical level.
Arguing the Dyson stick vacs aren't durable without strong evidence of a wide range of widespread failures (distinct from single isolated issues) is nonsense because all mechanical devices can have occasional issues. Real weaknesses are things like needing replacement belts, filters, or other ancilliaries. Seeing claims of lack of durability without evidence is a mindless smear by the weakly positioned. Terms like "creaky squeaky hard plastic" are hallmarks of nonissues that show incredible ignorance, as cemented by mindless and childishly moronic terms like "Diesoon". You've come across very unrespectably because of all this. Don't bring up this silly, nonsensical non-argument again; it just makes you look incredibly foolish. If you think you're right about anything you have to say, come back with the only thing that's relevant: convincing, objective, independently verifiable evidence. It's what I present in all my videos and what gives me confidence, and others can manage it. You wouldn't know because you've never apparently bothered to properly and carefully watch any of them, it seems. You've never, ever provided a dot of evidence for any of your positions, except the history of cyclonic cleaners that no one sensible even argued about. This lack of strong supporting evidence is why you carry absolutely no respect whatsoever with me in your outbursts. You've demonstrated repeatedly to be a hollow talker, like many that loiter here. It was obvious from the beginning because even when I provided the quantified scientific explanation and maths behind an airflow correction factor for vane anemometers in pipes, explaining why it has that value that you otherwise just simply looked up and auto-accepted, you just brushed it off as gobbledygook showing you just can't be helped to understand low level, relevant details, and to have better grounding for your output—which is why it's so wonky and is clearly subjectivity masquerading as objectivity. This conflicts so strongly with your repeated statements about your past history in defence and engineering. No one in my team would survive 5 minutes if they didn't independently learn to establish what's true from first principles and be superior.
I have a track record of looking at old machines people have claimed are good without good reason. They weren't, and the pathetic crybabies kicked and screamed and cried rivers when the evidence showed as much. I have a track record of investigating modern machines that manufacturers claim or imply are market-leading. They weren't and I exposed their deception quantitatively. Tribal idiots kicked and screamed and cried rivers over that too as they defecated all over my YT channel in bizarre rage. I know what's true because the evidence shows it. If anyone thinks I'm a Dyson fanboy, they're going to be spectacularly embarrassed and exposed as the pathetic, ignorant, tribal fools the best of us already know they were come my V16 review—the first real reason to heavily criticise (and praise) a Dyson product, as the evidence will show. And it'll be the same evidence, I might add, that is used to praise and criticise all other products. I'm consistent; the whiny, tribal crybabies are not. And calling a spade a spade on my channel doesn't make me "rude" or "hostile" or "insulting". These are terms used by genuine pillocks to try and cosmetically smear when they've got absolutely no substantive argument of their own, so look out for the culprits and judge accordingly, as many do I now know. Fortunately, most people are positive and respectful, even if they disagree, and they're treated as such, but there are always a few rotten eggs with bad attitudes that need putting in their place—the bin. Until I arrived, they congregated here. Now they've scuttled off back under the bridge where they came from with all the other trolls.
