Your Thoughts On Turbopowers!

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

"Often because it is something they don't want to hear, and the truth often doesn't want to be heard"

When you get older you will hopefully learn that the difference between a truth and an opinion is a very grey area in actual fact.

There were 29 messages before you commented, written by eight different members. No one who posted was complaining. Those in Vacuumland who had nothing to say refrained from posting. The group moderators were taking no action. Then you came on, added you comments, before discrediting the whole topic simply because you have a problem with it. That is the truth.
 
Slightly off topic, but it's funny how much better the activator was in the Turbopower compared with the later Juniors. It seemed that the older style brushroll worked much better in the Junior design compared with the TP.
 
@alexhoovers94 ~

Sorry to hear that. I hope things get better for you. I'm always here if you can put up with my annoyance :P. Also ~ Sorry if I came across as a bit "bitchy" in my last comment.

@vintagerepairer ~ (reply 43) ~ Well Alex is entitled to his opinions and thoughts,even if people do dis agree,tough! Basically.

@turbo500 ~ To be honest I never seen the point in adding the Activator to the Juniors. For me it seemed to take away the "character" of the Juniors. Also ~ It doesn't matter if it's off topic :P.

[this post was last edited: 8/2/2015-07:37]
 
Chris, I think it was just the 80s juniors in general, they don't perform as well as the 70's ones, even with the original agitator brushroll, the airflow and beating action was not as good in the 80d style juniors I found.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top