The Pure Power of Hoover?

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

I got my mum one of these a few months back.

I tried it before taking it to her house & frankly hated it, it seemed creaky & cheap to me (no offence is meant by this it's just what I thought). It seemed to work ok (not great but ok) & I do like the looks, in a sort of retro way it looks cool. Nice to still see a bagged vac too ( I still consider bagless the work of the devil ! lol lol

My mother however loves it & keeps going on about it's power etc etc, so the actual owner is happy.

Enjoy your Hoover.

Dave
 
Thanks Dave.

It does definately have a sense of cheapness to it, I don't like the fact you have to put lots of force on the reclining switch, but it is nice to use a bag, espescially with the bag that seals itself when you remove it, trapping in the dirt.
 
If Hoover did put a bag on the freedom where the dust container goes, they would be doing what Eureka does in the USA with the Airspeed Vacs. They colour the dust bin in, so you can't see it, & have a bag that fills at the side. I could see thm doing that.

Does anyone think Vax will bring out bagged machines again?
 
The recline pedal is a famous problem area on the Purepower, it always has been, and very often, becuase its so stiff against heavy spring pressure, people dont press it hard enough, and create a clicking sound as they force the cleaner to recline. Over time this wears away the plastic engaging hook, or simply snaps it off, and then the unit wont stand up on its own. The fact that HooverCandy have never altered this in the 17 years that the Purepower has been going , suggests they do it deliberately as a kind of planned obsolescence - ie, they do it deliberately to try to ensure that this part breaks, and the user then dashes out and buys a new Purepower, thus increasing profits for the board of directors.


Deliberately designing in weak points, or failure points in an appliance is very common - it ensures more repeat sales of new machines.


 


On a washing machine, one of the most common failure points, especially in American front loaders, is the drum support spider, which corrodes though and fractures, usually just after the warranty expires, or in the case of UK Hotpoint/Indesit machines, drum bearing failure is the usual method of planned obolescence.
 
Hoover

The planned obsolesence is just the people in HQ's wanting to make money, without realising that possibly, if people end up buying their product's several times and realising the bad design, they may turn to different manufacturers.


 


However, I doubt this will happen with Hoover, as they have the fact that people still think they make quality products like the older machines, but it's now the opposite of that.
 
Good to see someone else knows what other brands are doing where converting from bagless vacs to bagged is concerned, Hi-Lo.

I dont think Vax have properly marketed themselves as a brand who can offer bagged vacuums in the UK. They have produced a handful of cylinder vacs in recent years but they don't get as much presence advertising wise and Vax don't let a lot of their models hang around.

They produced that bagged AND bagless series for Argos Value but they have never released a bagged upright under their own name with that design - pity though as I had one and found it to be quite good.

Even the old VCU02 bagged upright I bought only just a year ago has disappeared from Vax Commercial UK's website and they don't sell them any more.
 
Vax see themselves as a direct competitor to Dyson - they have copied enough of his designs. Their aim is to poach potential Dyson customers by producing very similar looking machines, but at a fraction of the price of a Dyson.


The Mach Air and Air3 was a direct competitor to the DC24/25, and the Mach Zen was a very close copy of the DC02, so close that Dyson sued Vax over copyright.

[this post was last edited: 5/31/2014-12:31]
 
They have, yes, but they are all failing to mention the watts. One can only assume that PU7100010101010010 whatever the heck the number is, means 700 watts??

Actually the real name and number is Hoover Purepower PU71PU01001

I noticed Vax have done this with their Air-3 upright as well - failing to mention the actual motor power. On QVCUK, the motor power is listed as 1000 watts but is this correct? Anyone know?

http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/2585303.htm
sebo_fan++7-1-2014-07-36-6.jpg.png
 

Latest posts

Back
Top