Straight suction canisters vs powered brush canisters.

VacuumLand – Vintage & Modern Vacuum Enthusiasts

Help Support VacuumLand:

But!

That is not to say I dont like them as collectables, especially the PN1 and PN2 Electroluxes, it is just very rare that i use one.
 
Straight Suction vs Power Nozzle

Hans,
These guys need to see your Apex. Talks about a powerful machine. I WOULD NOT have believed it until I saw an Apex in action!
When I saw one, I just kept thinking -THIS IS JUST STRAIGHT SUCTION?
I really could not believe it.
 
My mother used for years, her grandmother's Hoover 612.

In summer 1981, at a holiday cottage, we had the use of a Hoover Conquest cylinder, which was quite easy to use, and versatile.

Easter 1982, and the Hoover 612's motor packed in. Without a hoover for a fortnight, mum tried to brush the dog hair from the synthetic carpet - a hopeless task. So, off to Currys in Kilmarnock, and we came back with the new Hoover "Sensotronic System 2" suction cleaner

Mum used it for a couple of days, declared it was too awkward to use as a daily cleaner for dog hair, and banished it upstairs. The 612 was repaired and pressed back into service as the primary remover of fluff, dust and grit from carpets.

The Sensotronic was used to clean surfaces above floor, stairs, beds and the car.

So ideally, two different machines are best - and two people can use them at the same time, especially if getting the house shipshape for visitors at Christmas, etc. And, if one breaks down, the other is likely to be available.
 
Sensotronic

Calum

The ironic thing is that Hoover were the only mainstream brand to offer a PN in the UK, and it was a good one too - a little smaller than US models so ideally suited to our, generally smaller homes. If she had opted for a Senso 3 or 5 I doubt the 612 would ever have seen the light of day again

Al
 
Alistair

The Hoover Sensotronic System 3 did not come with a powerhead, although it would have been possible to add one as the power take off socket was on the remote control. System 4 and 5 had the Electro Kinetic head as standard, followed by the revamped system 40 and 50 models and finally systems 400 and 500 which used the Turbo 300 powerhead which I preferred to the Electro Kinetic one.

 
The only reason I can see for a power nozzle being necessary is if there was an abundance of pet hair to be removed.

Buttons (cat) has started molting recently but her hairs still come off the carpet easily with the straight suction floor tools on my cylinders. It comes down to the velour strips and good suction.

That reminds me, I need to buy another strip of velour for my Tango's floor tool, does anyone know where I can buy velour strips ?
 
Well, growing up where we had a Hoover Senior, then replaced by the scary Ranger, then replaced by a Junior, neither of them were as good when it came to using the tools and thus the Hoovers were naturally best for the carpets. 


 


When it came to vacuuming carpets we always had Hoover back in the early days. When it came to cleaning dust out of awkward corners, we had something called a dust pan and brush.  When we needed to get rid of cobwebs, a towel tied around a kitchen brush with elastic bands seemed to do the trick. Dust on hard floors? Kitchen broom, dust pan and/or brush.


 


How times have moved on, eh?


 


Jamie, you may well refer that it is your opinion of what you have declared, but stating "if the cylinder doesn't have enough suction to work effectively without a P/N, it shouldn't be in any collection," bears a statement that could overthrow others and their experiences. Please be aware of that. Since you give no actual evidence of any cylinder vacuum that is poor, you should learn to just stop spouting hoof before adding "two watts" as a final sentence to conclude your post.


 


As the owner of a Sebo K3 Premium, and have said this before, I'm not a fan of the cylinder with a PN idea; however I don't find the whole process to be that awkward, otherwise I'd have sold off my ET-H ages ago.  I find it too heavy, having to pull the machine behind me and then push a heavy floor head in front, regardless of the fact that the Sebo head does have a slight self mechanised driven feel about it and the K series is far lighter than the D4 anyway - but it still doesn't make things better - when I know that the Felix upright is far easier to use and everything is "all in one" in front.


 


However basing my only experience with the Sebo P/N which is effectively similar to the ones on the Sebo Felix, PNs do the same job as an upright - you get a better flatter to the floor angle with the PN's connected to just the tube, hose and cylinder at the back and of course being able to get under low furniture is a boon compared to a conventional upright. Also, dependent on the need at the time, being able to use the same power head with just the hose & handle is great for use in the boots of cars, especially if you have an estate/station wagon. 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 
 
Sensotronic Systems

Benny,

The first generation of Sensotronics as shown in the TV ad linked in an earlier post were as follows:

System 1 S3126 Basic model single speed straight suction in Red

System 2 S3128 Variable speed control and economy switch in green

System 3 S3132 Straight suction with remote control handle in a milk chocolate brown

Total System 4 S3130 Same control panel as system 2 with added power hose and Electrokinetc head in cream

Total System 5 S3134 Same as system 3 but with the power head in dark brown

The link showing a Sensotronic system 4 looks like a System 3 to me. The person who posted it has either made a mistake with the model name or this system 4 was an exlcusive model based on the mass market system 3. I know Comet sold exclusive systems 25, 35 & 55 models but I didn't know about a system 4 exclusive.

Throughout the life of the Sensotronic ranges, only the top two models has a power head as standard.
Total System 4, Total System 5, Total System 40, Total System 50, System 400 and System 500. The talking model the Audio 300 was available with a power head in some countries but not the UK.
 
Hello and thanks for explaining that. I knew that the top three models were a combination of remote controls and PN's, concluding with both on the system 5. I do wonder why Hoover made five cleaners and not just four, because I think that system 3 is redundant almost if you think that people who could have afforded that sort of cleaner may well have wanted to go the whole ten-miles and have the system 5 with the PN. Either way, of all the first-range sensotronics which came my way, most were system 1 and 2 models. I know that even they were quite a lot of money. Do you know how popular systems 3, 4, and 5 were? I do once remember giving a lady a price for a new remote control hose. She almost fainted! What she did next, I don't know, but she never bought the hose off me.
 
I have no idea how popular systems 3, 4 and 5 were, but during the time they were on sale, I only saw a system 4 in an independent store in Croydon and can't remember seeing a system 3 on my travels. I saw mostly systems 1, 2 and 5. My very first brand new vacuum cleaner in my collection was a Hoover Sensotronic Total System 5 purchased in 1983 from SEEBOARD (south eastern electricity board) in East Grinstead, Sussex. I was too young to afford to buy it, so my dad signed the HP form for me and I paid for it out of my pocket money.
My version had the earlier power hose which was prone to splitting. It was replaced with the new silver version during the guarantee period.
 
Hi

Today I tried a powerhead/ nozzle attachment with rotating brushes on one of my older Numatics. I've had the attachment a while but apart from just testing it worked hadn't used it.

I've got to say the difference in the appearance of the carpets compared to just using straight suction is very noticeable,(all my vacuums are straight suction canister types) the pile has clearly been lifted.
I did find it a bit of a pain to set up & a bit less manouverable than the standard system but i'll definitely be using it every few weeks just to freshen the carpet up.

I'm converted !

Thanks
Dave
 
In some situations a bare-suction nozzle is still adequate by todays standards,Or at least by my standards,:O)
Anyways,For example,One of my favorite (And most used) Cleaners,Is my 1968 Fair-Fax Home sanitation system,I mainly use it do to the following reasons,
MANY attachments,
EXTREMELY quiet
2-speed
Versatile.
This cleaner,However,Does not come with a power-nozzel,Even though i have pretty much all of the attachements,All i am missing is the floor-polisher,But i will check with that soon,As i am doing a video of it for my re-vamped youtube page
(Vacguy99).
Anyways,I have burber carpeting,and the nozzle does an excellent job of daily cleaning,But for the more fine,Rubbed in grit i bring out the Hoover Floor-Max or Electrolux L.

-Alex.
 
Miele

My Miele cleans well with the PN but the hose is so short its not good at above floor cleaning, I do wish it was easy to get a good canister with PN's in the UK even Miele have stopped now, I have 2 but when they burn out I'm not sure what I will get. The one make it will not be is SEBO what a waste of money the felix was. Very good design and cleans OK, but such poor build
 
I must admit that now i've used one & seen how good they are, I do wonder why they're not more readily available.
I've used the air-powered heads & whilst they appear to be better than the straight suction heads they're noisy & don't seem as good as the electrically powered ones.
Perhaps manufacturers need to educate people as to the benefits of powered heads on cylinder vacuums.

Dave
 
i love this debate

every time this kind of thing comes up i always read the whole thing its intresting to see everyones points of view, i personally still prefer an upright but i think thats more psychological we have been told so many times uprights clean better, i do have a few machines with power heads i have a miele cat and dog with optional powerhead also 2 wertheim vacuums both with powerheads the 4412 and the 4430 these are exellent vacuums they pull so much dirt out but are very unreliable as they are more or less tti machines where as before they were made by electrolux the power heads are more like older hoover ones as they are vmetal and have the beater bars and very stiff bristles and do an amazing job on pet hair and embedded grit but i still like my uprights as i get so annoyed having to pull the machine behind me while i clean oh well everyone has their own opinion my sister loves her wertheim and doesnt mind pulling it around, i do wish though that some of these new uk hoover machines had powerheads instead of the air driven turbo heads i just like to have this kind of thing in my collection
 
David - its the brands who are fault in so far as cylinders with P/N' availability in the UK. They want more sales of their uprights and not of their cylinder vacs. Some brands offer both though and don't bother with the fear of snatching sales from either sector.
 
when i was a small boy

back in the early 60s my grandma had an electrolux Z62 [no fitted carpets back then] she never used the floor tool instead she liked to use the upholstery tool on the end of the two wands .I once asked her why .She said that big thing is too clumsy its easier to get under the furiture and behind the telly and any other nooks and cranies she came across with the small tool .She also liked to empty ashtrays with the machine causing it to stink of stale ciggies .The Z62 was still in use in the late 90s when gran died
 
Royal 311

Royal continued making full-size straight suction upright cleaners for commercial use until 1985; their 311 was the last such offering after the Electro-Hygiene 2-230 was replaced in their consumer line in 1955 by the 285 with the revolving brush.

~Ben

kirbyclassiciii-2025021216383209217_1.jpg

kirbyclassiciii-2025021216383209217_2.jpg
 
‘She also liked to empty ashtrays with the machine causing it to stink of stale ciggies…’

Reminds me of this image from an Air-Way manual, emptying an ashtray with the hollow handle!

electricutopia-2025021220012501881_1.jpg
 
Aside from wet/dry shop vacs, the only two straight suction canisters I've ever used were a late '50s vintage Lewyt that looked like a pink and gray fire hydrant, and an Electrolux 1205 with a leaky hose that Dad grabbed from a neighbor's trash pile in the early '80s.

The Lewyt was our only vacuum cleaner when I was little, so I had nothing to compare it with. We had no wall-to-wall carpet, only area rugs, so it seemed pretty satisfactory. We got a Hoover Convertible (tan and green 'Brady Bunch' model) in the early '70s, and wall-to-wall carpeting seemed to systematically follow.

I didn't understand about leaky cloth hoses when I was a teenager, so I just assumed the Electrolux just wasn't a great performer. I finally proved that theory wrong when I rescued it from my parents' attic in 2016 and connected it to a vinyl hose and PN2 for probably the fist time in its existence, and unleashed its true power.

By that time, I was well aware of that a canister with a power nozzle was a formidable cleaning tool, having gotten my grandmother's Eureka Princess power team in about 1996 or '97. I've been a fan of that configuration ever since because of its lighter weight and greater maneuverability in tight spaces. Although these days, I have settled on metal Electroluxes (1205 and newer) as my canisters of choice, I'd still like to get my hands on another Eureka like my grandmother's. I still regret letting that one get away from me when I was married. Believe me, I miss that machine more than I miss my ex-wife.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top