jade_angel
Well-known member
So, the other day, just after I got home from work, a Kirby salesman knocked on my door, wanting to do a demo of the new Avalir.
I figured, sure, why not - I get to see the new Kirby, and I get my landing shampooed. What have I got to lose?
Well, I was pretty impressed at first - it did a bang-up job on my stairs, which I've been cleaning with a straight-suction upholstery tool on either a Filter Queen or a Simplicity Verve. He must have pulled four dirty pads from each step, mostly cat fuzz. Then he broke out the hose. Well, I don't know what I was expecting, but it seemed to have pretty much identical airflow and suction to my Kirby (a Heritage II Legend). Did well, of course, but nothing to write home about.
But then, he did the "salt test" - y'know, where they pour salt onto the rug, have me vacuum, then show me how much salt the Kirby pulls up behind it? Well. That was a surprise - for the fellow doing the demo. He poured the salt, then I pulled out the Simplicity Verve - with a new bag - and vacuumed over the patch with the PN set at low height, maybe ten strokes. He set up the Kirby, went over the patch, and only got a few grains of salt on the dirtmeter pad. Wow. I mean, the vacuum that goes last *always* gets something the first one missed, but I was shocked by how little salt was left.
I knew those Simplicity PNs were good, but I didn't expect them to do quite that well. Even more surprising, though - I put a dirtmeter on my Heritage II and went over that patch afterward, and got a fairly even, though light, coat of salt grains on the pad. Kind of a disappointing showing for the Avalir, no?
I wonder why? Too soft a brush roll? Wrong height? Wrong adjustment? Heritage II brushroll is just a better fit for my specific rug? Everything I know about Kirbys tells me the Avalir ought to outperform the Heritage II, and yet, it didn't seem to, at least in that completely unscientific one-shot "test".
I figured, sure, why not - I get to see the new Kirby, and I get my landing shampooed. What have I got to lose?
Well, I was pretty impressed at first - it did a bang-up job on my stairs, which I've been cleaning with a straight-suction upholstery tool on either a Filter Queen or a Simplicity Verve. He must have pulled four dirty pads from each step, mostly cat fuzz. Then he broke out the hose. Well, I don't know what I was expecting, but it seemed to have pretty much identical airflow and suction to my Kirby (a Heritage II Legend). Did well, of course, but nothing to write home about.
But then, he did the "salt test" - y'know, where they pour salt onto the rug, have me vacuum, then show me how much salt the Kirby pulls up behind it? Well. That was a surprise - for the fellow doing the demo. He poured the salt, then I pulled out the Simplicity Verve - with a new bag - and vacuumed over the patch with the PN set at low height, maybe ten strokes. He set up the Kirby, went over the patch, and only got a few grains of salt on the dirtmeter pad. Wow. I mean, the vacuum that goes last *always* gets something the first one missed, but I was shocked by how little salt was left.
I knew those Simplicity PNs were good, but I didn't expect them to do quite that well. Even more surprising, though - I put a dirtmeter on my Heritage II and went over that patch afterward, and got a fairly even, though light, coat of salt grains on the pad. Kind of a disappointing showing for the Avalir, no?
I wonder why? Too soft a brush roll? Wrong height? Wrong adjustment? Heritage II brushroll is just a better fit for my specific rug? Everything I know about Kirbys tells me the Avalir ought to outperform the Heritage II, and yet, it didn't seem to, at least in that completely unscientific one-shot "test".